Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SHOULD WE EAT SALT?

We ought to give up eating salt, says Mr Leslie Wilson, the food and diet expert, in the London Magazine. The one broad principle he lays down is that man cannot digest any portions of the earth he treads j "between him and the possibility of assimilating minerals there is a wide gulf." It is true tliat man requires the mineral salts to keep him in health, but these minerals exist in abundance in the foods which Nature Seems to have intended for the eubsis-, tence of mankind. If we persist in" consuming these minerals in their raw state they can only bring us discomfort and dissatisfaction, for it is a law of Nature that man can only assimilate the mineral salts after they have gone through the process of vegetable growth and become living substances. These vitalised salts which we eat in fruits, vegetables, and in the flesh of grazing animals, undergo chemical changes in his blood arid become eventually part of the living tissues of his body. On the other hand, common table salt is never assimilated, and has no power to repair tissue waste. Common illustrations, such as the putting of meat in brine, prove that salt has great penetrative power through animal tissues; its use as a snow-melter and its effect on boot leather when so employed show that it weakens animal fibres ; its moistness in damp weather shows that it cttnuts water, while its application to raw flesh proves how strong a nerve irritant it is. The preservative quality bf salt on 'he waste tissues of the body, pre venting their elimination, is a slow, but a Sure process, resulting in the retention oi these salted tissues to form the tffound.wprk of many painful diseases. It 's interesting also to note that common salt, when excreted from the body by miy channel' is al'ways man unaltered state, thus showing it to be unaffected oy the process of digestion. But such talt, ip the course of its journey through tho body, has worked great havoc, for it has weakened the whole structure, making mombranes tough that were once .elastic.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19111118.2.83.11

Bibliographic details

Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 12615, 18 November 1911, Page 1 (Supplement)

Word Count
357

SHOULD WE EAT SALT? Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 12615, 18 November 1911, Page 1 (Supplement)

SHOULD WE EAT SALT? Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 12615, 18 November 1911, Page 1 (Supplement)

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert