Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LIQUOR CASES.

A number of adjourned c'aaes were dealt with at the Police Court this morning, before Mr W. A. Barton, S.M. v Charges. of procuring liquor during the currency of a prohibition order were made against Richard " Solomon, James McConville, John Heaphy and Adam Knox. Referring to the former Sergt. Hiitton said accused was convicted lor a similar offence m December last, and bound over m his own recognisance m the sum of £5 to come up when called upon. There were 46 convictions against accused. When his Worship called on accused to show cause why sentence should not be passed upon him m this case, accused said he had nothing to say. Altogether the accused- was lined £10 and costs 9s, m default three months' imprisonment m the Napier gaol, .- .. . . John "Heaphy l was charged with drunkenness for a third time within six months, and -was sentenced to 14 days' hard labor 'in Napier prison. Upon the charge of procuring liquor accused was fined! £5 and costs 2s, m default §ix weeks' imprisonment m Napier prison, this sentence to commence at and from the termination of the former sentence. For a similar offence Adam Kiiox Was fined 1 £10 and costs 2s, m default three months' hard lahor m Napier prison. Robert Russell pleaded not guilty to si charge of supplying liquor to Adam Knox, a prohibited person. — Constables Dand>y v and Pratt gave evidence as to seeing the defendant supply liquor to Knox, wjiom he said he knew was a prohibited person.— Defendant contradicted tho polioe evidence, saying he had | given Knox a "nip," but had not known me was prohibited. — His Worship said ho ' was quit© satisfied accused was guill^. It was such persons as accused who rendered prohibition orders useless. When he (his Worship) had cases brought before him and proved he intended) inflicting the maximum penalty. Accused was fined £10 and co»ts 2s, m default to be recovered by distress, and m default of sufficient distress two months' imprisonment m the Napier gnol. For drunkenness •& first offender was fined Ibe* amount of his bail, £1.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19090519.2.24

Bibliographic details

Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XXXVI, Issue 11854, 19 May 1909, Page 5

Word Count
351

LIQUOR CASES. Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XXXVI, Issue 11854, 19 May 1909, Page 5

LIQUOR CASES. Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XXXVI, Issue 11854, 19 May 1909, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert