THE DRUCE CASE.
(Press Assn. — By Telegraph — Copyright) (Received December 3. 10.53 a.m.) LONDON, Dae. 2. In the Druce case, Oaldw«U, cross-ex-amined, said lie was unaware there >vas a. tombstone m Londonderry cemetery m memory of his daughter Caroline. If there was it must have been erected by her brother William, since Caroline was buried at Aghavea. The Highgate grave was opened, and the coffin showed an inscription that Druce was buried there: It did not affect Jiis testimony, as the inscription must have been:, placed on it. since the coffin was deposited there. , A gardener who wjis employed by the fiRTI Duke of Poi-tland deposed that Druce's photograph did not resemble the Duke.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19071203.2.59
Bibliographic details
Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XXXIV, Issue 11141, 3 December 1907, Page 6
Word Count
114THE DRUCE CASE. Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XXXIV, Issue 11141, 3 December 1907, Page 6
Using This Item
The Gisborne Herald Company is the copyright owner for the Poverty Bay Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Gisborne Herald Company. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in