Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE PORT.

To the Editor. ,Sir,—Tho manager of the South Tariimiki Shipping Com,puny, in his reply to my lotier, has established throe facts: (I) That 1 gave the wrong date of the boats leaving 'Wellington; (2) that it was impossible for the Haweru to bring cargo on account of having taken a load of frozen cargo; and ft!) that he will not hesitate to do the same thing again. As to (1): There is not much comment, as if I had followed my correspondence instead of trying to do too much while typing, it would not have happened, and it does not affect the result that three boats sailed without picking up the cargo. As to (2): It is a different matter. The Havvera had just finished discharging a load of butter, and sailed at 8 pan. Would the boat have taken cargo had she discharged a load of cheese? I think not, as it is not usual to load boats at S' p.m. in a large port, so why put forward that excuse? When llie Wavcrlcy was running, she carried practically nothing from Patca but frozen meat, and why could she bring back cargo trip after trip? As many factories have gone into butter, if this rule applies, when are the business people in this district going to get their goods? Coming to (3): Mr. Hodge makes it quite plain that his first duty is to fulfil his allotments of dairy produce. This is a very serious matter. Why docs the company accept cargo when it knows that it will bo left lying in Wellington? Would Mr. Hodge get his agents to sort out a case of general cargo from a collection of, say, 50 tons, because I had advised him that it was required? I leave this to his clients to draw' their own conclusions. It is all right to put over a good bluff, and thank a small percentage of his clients for advising him of expected cargo, but if they had got a fair deal, and cargo had not been left behind in the past, why tho necessity of making any arrangements for shipment? It would appear that experience teaches a bitter lesson. I would not have bothered you again over this matter, but when the future plans of the company arc laid so fully before us by its manager it is but fair to review the position. I am, etc., BUSINESS.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PATM19310302.2.13.2

Bibliographic details

Patea Mail, Volume LII, 2 March 1931, Page 2

Word Count
406

THE PORT. Patea Mail, Volume LII, 2 March 1931, Page 2

THE PORT. Patea Mail, Volume LII, 2 March 1931, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert