Clark v. Haggen.
By Telegraph—Prtat Association.
Wki.lino ton, This day. j In the* Supreme Court on Saturday, the Wtxxlville criminal libel caw, , (.'lark v. Haggen, was mentioned. Mr | Jollicoc asked the Chief Justice if it 1 were necessary for the prosecutor tooppear seeing t but the cam bad been Nettled by the parties. His honor said that had nothing whatever to do with tlx* i court: prosecutor had set criminal law, in motion ami he had been bound over I to present a bill, and if lie did uot do ' so his recognisances would be estreated unless he was able to show Mifimnut cause why it diould not k . Urinai* 1 law ahs not to be made use of in order to obtain civil remedy : that would be abuse oi court. Mr Jcllieoc said that xvith bis Honor's permission be would mention the case again.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PAHH18931204.2.14
Bibliographic details
Pahiatua Herald, Volume I, Issue 83, 4 December 1893, Page 2
Word Count
145
Clark v. Haggen.
Pahiatua Herald, Volume I, Issue 83, 4 December 1893, Page 2
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in