Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BUILDING BY-LAWS.

A SUPREME COURT DECISION. .PALMERSTON N., February 20. Reserved judgment vvas delivered by Mr Justice Ostler in the Supreme Court to day on an appeal bv the Woodville Borough Council against the decision of Mr S L. P. Free. S.M., in dismissing five informations for alleged breaches of the building by-laws. The appeal was allowed, and the matter was referred to the magistrate to fix penalties. The case was one in which the defendant vvas charged with erecting a partv wall otherwise than in accordance with the by-laws, and also with failing to pull down the. wall within a reasonable time after notice to do so. The magistrate decided that the law bad been settled n a previous decision of the Supreme Court, in which it was held that a certificate by an inspector vvas conclusive proof that the building was in accordance with the bylaw

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OW19280228.2.352

Bibliographic details

Otago Witness, Issue 3859, 28 February 1928, Page 77

Word Count
148

BUILDING BY-LAWS. Otago Witness, Issue 3859, 28 February 1928, Page 77

BUILDING BY-LAWS. Otago Witness, Issue 3859, 28 February 1928, Page 77

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert