Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RAILWAY APPEAL BOARD.

TIMARU, April 26. The Railway Appeal Board sat here-to-day to hear the appeal of J. T. Fowler, a porter who was discharged as medically •unfit and refused the pension of £4 a year provided by the Superannuation Act, he having been a contributor to the fund. The department took the stand that Fowler was a probationer, and entitled only to a refund of the oontriSutions. According to the evidence, he was in good health when he joined the service. Mr T. C. Watson, for the appellant, contended that he was not a probationer, and that, being able to do light work, his retirement was not justified, but, being retired, he was entitled to the pension. Mr Haselden this was the first case of the kind he' had heard, the point interesting, and the board would reserve decision* . . .

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OW19110503.2.2

Bibliographic details

Otago Witness, Issue 2981, 3 May 1911, Page 3

Word Count
140

RAILWAY APPEAL BOARD. Otago Witness, Issue 2981, 3 May 1911, Page 3

RAILWAY APPEAL BOARD. Otago Witness, Issue 2981, 3 May 1911, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert