THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE PRIVY COUNCIL.
( LONDON, September 14. | The Daily Chronicle, referring to Sir Robert Stout's statement re Privy Council delays, declares that the formation of an Imperial Court of Appeal, securing regular services of the b~est judicial talent of the Empire, might well engage the attention of the next Colonial Conference. WELLINGTON, September 14. Sir Robert Stout, in a letter to the New j Zealand Times, ieferring to the published denial by the Lord Chancellor of the de-lay in dealing with colonial cases before the Privy Council, says that during the last 15 I years 29 New Zealand cases have been dei cided by the Privy Council. Three of these ' took, from the date of the final decision by the New Zealand Court to the date of the Privy Council's decision, from nine montlis to under one year ; 13 took over one year and under two years; nine took between two and three years; two, three to four years ; one, over five ; and one required i seven, years. The Chief Justice adds.;.— <
"The Lord Chancellor has assumed that I blamed the Privy Council for the delay, but I did not state who, in my opinion, was to blame. I said, and I repeat, that a judicial system under which such delays occur requires reformation."
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OW19050920.2.105
Bibliographic details
Otago Witness, Issue 2688, 20 September 1905, Page 26
Word Count
217THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE PRIVY COUNCIL. Otago Witness, Issue 2688, 20 September 1905, Page 26
Using This Item
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Otago Witness. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.