Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Peculiar Charges.

| »■>•'. |t 'Wbstpobt, April 4th. • iThb long.pendmg caMes 1 , Welch 'V. Eugene O'qonnor/lJofih^'Oick, J/oh'n Gihonjore, arid ;wm&mM''Lj3an^ charged J&a&jm,' September,, ,is7B,jby a- forged, deed, they, did attempt to ; defraud 'Jahies Johnston of £150;* has been' •finisljedJ James JohriSton* deposed that the deed! was 'a forgery, and 'that' his signature.' 'also {those of William ' PittV, solicitor, and 'Leonard, Reid, soliciiJor^also upon the 'fleeq as attesting witnesses); were forgeries; anji unlike the broper'" signatures. „'S ydney Welch, informant, ( gave similar ' evidenced Leonard Fre'ewitU Reid, solicitor^ Timaru,' deposed ( that' 'he prepared the deed, arid Johnston's signature 'was iriade in' His presence' and that' pf 'O'Connof'and'others, afterthe'eont'eritshad been properly examined. ' After several bther'witnesses ' had /been Keard^ -Mr Hasleden, solicitor ' for ' accused^ 'stated that ' it was "absurd 'to address the Court in defence. 'He, would simply'ask' Mr Revell,' RiM., to dismiss ;the information'^ and commit Welch and ' /Johriston for wilful perjury. , Mr Revell then discharged the accused, and ordered Welch and Jbhristoriirito'custodyfor perjury; He 'stated that 'the charge was utterly, groundless, arid commented on the fact that Johnston had completely altered the 'signatures 'since the, deed was signed. " ' , , ■ Johnston 'v; Edward George Briton Moss, solicitor, Auckland, a separate charge of forging the same deed, was finished to-day. 'The eVidence was similar to'! the above, excepting that' Johnston stated , he believed the deed, to be in Moss' writing arid riot Reid's, ! and' so laid an information against Moss. ( In dis- ' missirig ' the v 'informaiii6ri,TV[r'' Revell said .the' evidence in the case • 'completely vindicated ' Mose, whobne said' left the'Court' without any stain, and it was" a riiatter of 'great regret that this case should have been the means of dragging a' 'solicitor "from so great a distance as Tauranga.' - ' . ■ The perjury case against Johnston m this matter is finished, 'and Johnston ' haß been committed for trial.' ' Great interest was taken in the case. ' '

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OW18820408.2.61.12

Bibliographic details

Otago Witness, Issue 1585, 8 April 1882, Page 24

Word Count
307

Peculiar Charges. Otago Witness, Issue 1585, 8 April 1882, Page 24

Peculiar Charges. Otago Witness, Issue 1585, 8 April 1882, Page 24

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert