Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

The Brunner Disaster.

Greymouth, May 12.

At the Commission to-day, the miners’ representatives disagreed with the theory of a coal dust explosion, and held the opinion that the explosion, started in the workings further down the dip, which could not be examined owing to the rise of water in the mine. The Press has now been admitted to the enquiry.

The evidence so far shows that the mine was well managed, and that there were no complaints made. It was the opinion of witnesses that under the circumstance there was no hope of saving the men, even had there been a dozen shafts and airways. Mr Bishop, mine manager, is at present being examined.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OPUNT18960515.2.15

Bibliographic details

Opunake Times, Volume IV, Issue 195, 15 May 1896, Page 3

Word Count
114

The Brunner Disaster. Opunake Times, Volume IV, Issue 195, 15 May 1896, Page 3

The Brunner Disaster. Opunake Times, Volume IV, Issue 195, 15 May 1896, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert