HOW TO AVOID LITIGATION.
A GOOD EXAMPLE FROM NORWAY,
"To -relieve*the courts from drudgery, without depriving the people of their rights, to obtain iegal rediess for legal wrorgs, be they ever so insigniScant," is*the object of the court of conciliation in Norway and Denmark. It has served its purpose so well that it has become the-most popular tvibnr.al in each country. The following, says the 11 -Atlantic Monthly " for -t-pieiniter. Is i ft reaaon-'bjy .full ontiine of the ni-u'n features'of .this-institution -as :il exists in Nofway-:— . .. .-.
I "Every city, every villago contain- ' ing nt 'e»s' twenty families, and eve-y ,i>»i'ish cous-ituttM a sep-ii",'ta dLtrict of ooMciliitioo. 'iistricts are small in urder to m*ke it-as easy as po-usiult} f>r .he pariied to atleu-l thp court, as pprsauai u'lßinJaDC^ i* the^nixiu i'a.urj of the proceedings. The court, o? com mission, as the statute styles it, is raa.de up of- two raetaWers, one of whom aci.s rk chairman find clerk, 'j'heso officials are chosen for a period of three years, at a special election,-bj" the vo'.ers of the cUstrJofc, tVoni among three men nominated by tho city or-parish council. Only men ai;of's 25 years of ajjo ate eligible, and tha la>v exp.e^iy provides (.hat only '* good meu " may be placed.! on uominanou. The court m^ets at a| c«rt»in place, day, ar.d hour, every week in tho-cities, and cv. ry month in the country districts It is not public, proceedings are <'arrier! on with cl'sed doors, nnd the commisioners are bound to sscteoy Nothing of what transpires is permitted to re^ch the outside "wo»Id. Admisvsious or concessions nmle by one party cannot be usod against him by his adversary, if the c^se should com« Xo tml ;n ihe r-gulur courts. But a putty willing to settle before the c>mmi^sioners is entitled to.their ce> titicate • to'that effect
■"Thexjoutt «>f conciliation'has'jurisdiction in ail civil or private ca-ea. Appearances -betort- the commissioners ia co:»ptslsory in all auch oases, aud the first atef» in a proceeding. iTh-i law court will <iismi.s9, ex otficKO, ev-ry caa« of ihis class that doea not co'rao ti|> to it from th« court of onciiiation with h certiticate of the commissioners attesting that an effort at a reconciliation of tue.-partie&'has beea duly made before. them. ■* :
4 The mode of procedure ia the peace court is as simple aa it could possibly -be. The plaintiff states his cisc in writing, reciting iv .pl»in every-day langu-ge the ixc s upou whfch h^ ba-es his compl'iint, and what he wants the defendant to dj or reham from duii-g, and requesting that the latfcor I<p cited to meet the plaintiff in tho coiiit of coijciliatiou to try to te^ch aa agreement in the u.annet* prescr bed by lnw. -he senior commissioner W'ifces the court's summons upon the cotnplnint,■ citing both parties to appear a f. the nnxt or spcoud sitnug, as the case may bo lie \ fee of 25c-nts is chargerl for i-suing the summons, to which is added 50 reuUs in the event of -a conciliation b>--ing fffected. These compose all'the cogra in this courr, »nd also aII that ibis courtoo-ts The c^nrar-sioni-r; receive no othet compensation than these am ill fees.
%<Th9 litigants must appexrin person, except in cases of sickness or very pressing hus'nens engagements when the vise ot a representative is a'lowed, p;o----viderl, however that he "be "not a practising attorney. Lawyers, are rigidly excluded from the court of conciliation, excpp-", of coursp, w.hen..tht>y atvefjd-in their own behalf, if a party fail to appear -inrpetson/with/mr. good excuse, he 1 will be ndjudged. to.p^y, jt.be costs in the law-court, even if he should, win the case. 'Rules an.? forms.pUy only a secondary part. The character and order of fhe objrcfc'of r,he rourt mate it pre-euiinpsitly a forutn of cumraoa Vebse unfettfred by legal firti-ias.' • I .-'...
"The very atmosphere'■'of 'he lowly\ eourt.ijoom ha« a softoaiog influence on those who enter it armed fo? a cori;esit for legal rights. Tbe judges are pericaally known to them, or w» perhaps
-their.friends, and are recognized as men in whom they can have implicit confidence. Even the humblest -citizen fuels :that in tbia sforuin-he-treads upon firm and -familiar ground. " There *re no intric «te {oi-maliti'-s to becloud the issue, no array of lawyers to confuse hi™» P0 crowd of curiosity-seeker's to gloat over bis discomfort. The judges and the contestants are the only ou'es present. Everything iuduces to nn open, frank, and dispassionate discuysion. pf the points at-issue. Efit-lj [Virty looks upon the commissioners as (ii^iiiCcrcsted, trustworthy, anH frieadly-couosftllrirs, Who wili give him only*such advice as will subserve his l>est interosts.
•"Why cannot we est-xbl-sh such courts of concilitfcfoM throughout th» English-spiking World-?" And is it fcoomuch to expect such an arrang.'-mflafc to obtsda «.vhh in Ohine-mm.-? M'ty we express a hope that some Uay. even ms Utopian a -Gaarfc an Cb^s may sit hei:e.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OG18911226.2.3
Bibliographic details
Ohinemuri Gazette, Volume 1, Issue 2, 26 December 1891, Page 2
Word Count
806HOW TO AVOID LITIGATION. Ohinemuri Gazette, Volume 1, Issue 2, 26 December 1891, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.