Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

REVISION OPPOSED

ENGLISH PRAYER BOOK SYNOD DISCUSSION Revision of the Common Prayer Book was opposed by cleric and lay members of the Synod of the Diocese of Dunedin when it debated at length yesterday a motion in the form of recommended methods of revision to the Standing Committee of General Synod, which has been authorised to set-up a Commission for that purpose. Synod, in a division, rejected the motion, 12 clergy and 19 laiety voting against it, with 16 clergy and 7 laiety voting in its favour.

The motion was by the .Rev. J. N. Thompson, who sought the Standing Committee of General Synod to include English personnel when setting up a Commission to revise the Common Prayer Book. Other clauses in the motion provided for a revision part by part over a trial period of five years in which the Commission would issue additional services to be used on the approval of diocesan bishops. Much of the discussion on the motion concerned the wisdom of revising the Prayer Book, speakers with a few exceptions maintaining that the 1662 Prayer Book was accepted and respected by both the clergy and congregations. The chairman, Bishop Fitchett. said he doubted whether the law could allow for a revised Prayer Book for trial use on an optional basis. The 1662 Prayer Book was binding by Act of Parliament for English churchmen. Since the church in New Zealand had itself adopted the book, he questioned whether New Zealand was in a position to alter it where English chyrch-' men were not able to do so.' Appeal for Funds Synod, after receiving the report of the Commission on Church Extension, in which was stressed the need for building up church funds, decided to authorise the Standing Committee to issue an appeal for funds, and to appoint an organiser. . . . , Session Concludes Synod, at its concluding sitting last night, passed four bills, and another was read a second time. The bills passed were: Mr A. H. Allen, to amend the Regulations of the Parishes Statute, 1892; Mr J. T. Dawson, to amend Sunday Statutes; the Rev. R. Newcombe, to amend the Clergy Pension Fund Statute, 1925; Mr W. E. Earnshaw, the General Church Fund Statute, 1892. Bishops’ Court

The Bishop approved the Bishop’s Court as follows:-—Clergy: Dean A. C. H. Button, Archdeacons L. G. Whitehead, J. A. Lush, W. A. Hamblett, Canon C. E. P. Webb, the Rev. R. Newcombe. Laiety: Messrs J. T. Dawson, F. W. Knight, G. R. Ritchie, J. Simpson, W. Grieve, C. H. Hargest.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19481022.2.94

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 26909, 22 October 1948, Page 6

Word Count
421

REVISION OPPOSED Otago Daily Times, Issue 26909, 22 October 1948, Page 6

REVISION OPPOSED Otago Daily Times, Issue 26909, 22 October 1948, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert