Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

UNSUCCESSFUL APPEAL

RIGHT OF JUSTICES TO HEAR CASE DR EVATT’S CHALLENGE Rec. 0.30 a.m. MELBOURNE, Feb. 9. The right of the Justices. Sir Hayden Starke and Mr D. Williams, to sit at the High Court hearing of the case was unsuccessfully challenged in the High Court by Dr Evatt (for the Commonwealth) on the ground that the justices may have had pecuniary interests, either directly or indirectly, in the hearing. Sir Hayden explained that his wife held shares in the National Bank of Australasia, but he had no pecuniary interest in them whatever. Mr Justice Williams said he was a shareholder in two of the banks concerned. The beneficial interest was enjoyed by his sister, who lived in Paris and who found it convenient to have the investments so arranged. He had no pecuniary interest whatever in the holdings

The Chief Justice, Sir John Latham, said a desirable course had been followed by stating the facts publicly. There could now be no suggestion of any concealment or secrecy. Seated at the Bar table were some 25 counsel, including eight K.C.’s. Mr G. Barwick, K.C., for the ( Bank of New South Wales, sought a declaration of invalidity of the whole Banking Act and also a large number of individual parts of it. Broadly, he said, the attacks numbered five. First, that the Act was not authorised by section 31 of the Commonwealth Constitution; secondly, that the Act, in three of its provisions—dealing with acquisition, management, and its prohibitory provisions—were obnoxious to section 92 of the Constitution; thirdly, in so far as the Act was justified under paragraph 31 (acquisition of property) it did not provide just terms; fourthly, the Act was an invasion of the constitutional integrity of the States; fifthly, the Act was inconsistent with section 105 and the financial agreements made thereunder. Mr Barwick said the Act contained an “ undisguised attempt to take over all business whether banking or not.” He described the definition of assetsas extremely wide and not limited to assets associated with banking.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19480210.2.80

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 26691, 10 February 1948, Page 5

Word Count
337

UNSUCCESSFUL APPEAL Otago Daily Times, Issue 26691, 10 February 1948, Page 5

UNSUCCESSFUL APPEAL Otago Daily Times, Issue 26691, 10 February 1948, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert