Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RADIO STANDARDS

Sir,—lf there was ever a case lor some [omi 01 intellectual dictatorship, surely we have it in the radio entertainment which is such a distressing commentary on the growing decay of our times, i am quite aware that provocative opinion win incur the noisy resentment of that moronic element which a timorous State leartully regards as " vox populi.” its ; inemoers will counter with the rather ob- ! \ ions advice Ihat if 1 do not like the tare winch wc receive I know what to 1 cio. No one could argue against the axiom ' mat one man s meat is another man s poison. "Dc gustibus non cst disi putancium." Hut mis problem cannot be ’ dismissed as summarily as that. Its most i disturbing cited ties ni its inlection ot our ! youth. Adults can. of course, accept or i reject the programmes that aic persisicnlly indicted on them, according to i their level of appreciation. But our I voting people are spoon-ltd on them, as I on some dogmatic and infallible faith, and ! accept them as gospel. Much of what ! they hear is rubbish—rubbish preceded, 1 interspersed and followed with stern or plavlul injunctions to consume with all I haste potent cures for a thousand and one ills itadio. with its enormous potentialiiies lor cultural advancement, has bei come an opiale, an instrument for inteli leclual subversion. Children listen with I rapt attention to cheap stories of crime I and romance. Is there not the material I in our English libraries, old and new, to provide a healthy excitement ol interest I j Apparently we must accept our diversions i ready made from overseas. .... . ; Our American friends are fully entitled ; naturally to hear what they wish, and m ’ their own idiom, but it is not our i ai?m. What is wrong with the King s English, which we in New Zealand once spoke I with more purity than do the Briton.-, 1 ihemgelves? Are wc ashamed of it, that I we have to cultivate an alien slang? And, I apart from this pollution of the an m 1 material, we have announcers playing ; down to their lowest audiences. From carlv morning, when these patronising -individuals infest the etr.er with then j weak witticisms and fake hcartiness vv 'hoar our language abusea and a foteign I one sedulous!v aped. For the most arresti ing demonstration of radio cnuncmUom I we turn, for comic reliel, to a station ! with its serried ranks of eager announcets, I ranging in weird variety from the tremu- ! ious R tiro to the richly pontMcal person who transports us. witn nian> la - phrases. to "Ahndy s Dahncc. To pi tit hinntlv there are too man> ustencis to-dav 'not. capable °C forming a sensible ! he done by someone competent J,.;” 1 ' j Dunedin, March 17.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19450320.2.118.1

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 25798, 20 March 1945, Page 7

Word Count
467

RADIO STANDARDS Otago Daily Times, Issue 25798, 20 March 1945, Page 7

RADIO STANDARDS Otago Daily Times, Issue 25798, 20 March 1945, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert