Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TAKEN BY SURPRISE

THE HAWAII LEADERS ORDERS NOT FOLLOWED FURTHER DETAILS OF REPORT NEW YORK, Jan. 25. The Pearl Harbour report declared that Admiral Kimmel and Lieuten-ant-general Short failed to confer with each other about the warnings and the appropriate measures of defence required by the imminence of hostilities. It was apparent that the Japanese had obtained complete information and knew that there was no naval force anywhere in the northeast and north-west sector of the Island of Hawaii. The Japanese apparently knew that no distant aeroplane reconnaissance was maintained on any sector, and up to December 6. no inshore air patrol was maintained around Oahu Island. The Japanese knew the exact location of the airfields and where the important warships were berthed. The Japanese flyers had the most detailed maps, courses and bearings, so that each could attack a given vessel or field. Each flyer seems to have been given a specified mission. The board absolved from responsibility the Secretaries of War, Navy and State, the Army Chief of Staff, and the Chief of Naval Operations. Plans Not Used The report said the responsible commanders at Hawaii had plans in their possession which would have prevented the disaster, but they failed to confer respecting warnings and orders issued on and after November 27, and did not use the existing plans to meet the emergency. Had the warnings and orders been complied with on December 7 the army's air draft warning system should have been operating. Among contributory causes to the success of the attack were the restrictions. such as those on wire tapping, which prevented counter-espionage. A further contributory cause was the failure of the War Department to reply to a message relating to the anti-sabotage measures taken by Short and the non-receipt by the commanders in Hawaii prior to the attack of the warning message sent shortly before hostilities began. False Sense of Security

The failure of Kimmel and Short to prepare adequately for attack resulted largely from a'sense of security due to the opinion prevalent in diplomatic, military and naval circles and the public press that any immediate Japanese attack would occur in the Far East. The attitude of each commander, however, demonstrated l£ck of appreciation of the responsibilities vested in him. The Japanese attack was a complete surprise to both commanders, who failed to make suitable dispositions to meet the attack, and failed properly to evaluate the seriousness of the situation. These errors of judgment were the effective causes of the success of the attack. The Pearl Harbour report revealed that the United States fired the first shots of the war when a destroyer patrol plane sank a small Japanese submarine just outside Pearl Harbour an hour before >the attack. Although this incident was reported to the naval base no “alert” orders were issued. A non-commissioned officer operating a sound detector located a large flight of planes north-east of Oahu, 130 miles distant, 45 minutes before the attack. The officer reported the discovery to an inexperienced lieutenant who took no action because he believed they were friendly planes.

Strength of Raiding Force

The information indicates that the Japanese used four aircraft carriers and between 150 and 200 planes, unnumbered supporting surface craft, and a few small submarines. On the morning of the attack the army’s permanent air raid warning had not been completed. Only mobile locator equipment had been installed on temporary locations, which operated for only three hours between 4 a.m. and 7 a.m. The Japanese attacked at 7.45 a.m. '

The army aircraft were bunched in the airport to guard against sabotage instead of being dispersed, which resulted in such heavy destruction that only a few fighters were able to take off after the Japanese attacked. The report said that Colonel Knox warned Mr H. L. Stimson (Secretary for War) >by letter in these terms; “ If war eventuates with Japan it is believed possible that hostilities would be initiated by a surprise attack upon the fleet or the naval base of Pearl Harbour.” Admiral Kimmel and Lieutenantgeneral Short received copies of the

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19420127.2.74

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 24825, 27 January 1942, Page 6

Word Count
677

TAKEN BY SURPRISE Otago Daily Times, Issue 24825, 27 January 1942, Page 6

TAKEN BY SURPRISE Otago Daily Times, Issue 24825, 27 January 1942, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert