PLACE OF FRANCE
SECOND-RATE POWER AN OUTSPOKEN FRENCHMAN MATERIAL v. MORAL FACTORS France is no longer a great country in the usual sense of the word “ great,” i.e., mighty and capable of violence (writes M. Detoeuf in the Frencli journal Noveaux Cahiers). If France were still a great country she would not have trembled for 15 years in the face of a disarmed Germany. She would not have sought a long series of guarantees of peace nor have spent 200,000,000,000 francs on armaments during the last 20 years. If France were still a great country she would have taken the lead when the Chaco war. the invasion of Manchuria, '■ and the expedition ' against Abyssinia successfully made it needful for the League of Nations to stand forth as the protector of the weak. If France had been a great country, she would, before the ‘ Ruhr, after the Ruhr, and in the days of Bruning, have concluded a generous peace with a defeated Germany. Lives by Sacrifices
Whatever nation deserves to be called a great country lives by collective sacrifices. Above the brutality, , the primitiveness, and the magnificent besetting tendencies of Germany, the German nation is now making a common sacrifice—a sacrifice accepted, despite their dissatisfaction, by even those persons in that country who are being ill-treated; underneath Italy’s bounce and deciet you will find the futile sacrifices , of the Abyssinian battlefields; behind England’s incomprehension and hypocrisy there is a collective consciousness which displays itself as soon as any peril even remotely threatens the English nation. But of what sacrifices are w® Frenchmen capable? Who in Francs will offer up to the public interest however little of his spirit and activity? Till the hour in which French soil is invaded —and then only because we retain the old elementary school tradition and have a lively sense of property—we shall be unable to pull ourselves together. j Let us not deceive ourselves. France IS; not big enough for the notion whicili: w:a»yiSnt: held of France. Her glorious’" dqggedness from ,1914 to 1918—which/ was spurred on by the invasion of her soil—has deceived both the world arid u i a I L JP|SII. thought that such an' effort showed us to be still a great' people, A; ■ ■ “ Where People are Happy” ;; v Believe the material plane •France is not ;jfcgreat country; France is. merely theVcountry where people are happy, / It is true that some Frenchmen—adiriirers of Russia and willing listeners;., to Russian advice-want France to go to War in the belief that thereby sne could play an important part on the. international stage. As if - social progress were brought about by; war. as >t the destruction of wealth were a means of bettering the humari lot. as n. war were not the best way of enit, may ' yet remain thaPj|pHpy.. where people are. happy, is. moderate,‘;Spraiere 7, -‘ the peasantry is peaceable/aM/sbund, where thinking is untrammelled. : arid work voluntary—the country with savings and ■ a spirit that radiates over-the world. . Comhion sense and an instinct for the 'happy mean, imagination, and generosity,, may be absent from our collective activities: in our individual actions; they are constantly visible. ' Human resourcefulness. a taste for work, and the personal equation are more frequent among us than anywhere else. That, and not material might, is what makes France great; that is what we need to preserve. New Effort Needed Unquestionably, if we are to pre-~. serve it, and even if we are merely to subsist, we must now put forth; a big effort—a big effort not to acquire might. -. but to acquire self-mastery. It is an effort we are equal to. and we shall make it. , Yet perhaps also France could become once again the mighty Power that she was a cerittiry ago. But for’ that she would have to give up politics, the pleasures of talk, competitions,for supernumerary jobs, intelligence, and superfluous discussion, prudence and irony. She would have to alter her morality and the. very way in which she understands life. She would have to think onty of be- •• coming disciplined, of organising herself, and of taking risks. She would have to suffer and be, ready to suffer. She would have to be no longer what ' we. know as France. , But there must be a choice. We must decide whether we want to be mighty . or happy. We must decide .whether, what we want is to terrify or to at- . tract. We must decide whether we wish to enforce our will or prefer to fascinate. We must decide between arming beyond our strength and living. ■ ■•, .... Have Already Bedded In the depths of our hearts we have already decided; but we behave, we shall always behave, as if we had not. We shall go on trying to seem to lead a part of Europe, go on refusing for the_ sake of a false prestige opportunities for peace, go on claiming to monopolise for ourselves a colonial dominion too large for our strength; and go on posing as a braggart in a way that some day may land us in . the warfare we abhor. If we decide to be mighty we shall have forthwith to go on a war footing—a complete war footing. We shall, have to welcome war in all its horror, its bombs and its poison gas, and -the civil wars that will come after it. and poverty, and very likely famine lasting a whole generation throughout a Europe finally given over to anarchy. Not to choose is impossible. It is impossible to go on being weak and yet to play at being strong. It is impossible to go on threatening, only to yield at the very moment in which the threat should be carried out. It is impossible for a country with a. population of 40,000,000 in disarray to have the armaments of a country having a population of from 70,000,000 to 80,000,000 who are on a military footing. An Impossibility It is impossible to be mighty while working only 40 hours when next door they are working 60; while eatirig our . fill when next door they make do with a beggar’s rations; while Insisting on the comforts of well-being when next door they are content with stage gesticulations; while arguing when next door they obey; while avoiding fatherhood when next door they K ,,forbid celibacy; while exporting nbMi'ijSSb-when next door the penalty ....... -for exporting funds is death; while being on a peace footing when next,? door they have martial law. r We must have courage to decide' on the one course that we can take, that/ of remaining France—a France smaller perhaps, on- the material;; plane, but greater intellectually arid% ! morally. . The French nation must make plain /; to its friends,that it has thought out' what peace .“jßifMjuires, and that in, future it iss»mg to conduct itself;;, very in the past. As regaras' material strength, we shall thus be what we are—a second-, class Power. But judged according, to the power of the intelligence andof the universal mofal values of justice V and freedom; according to art,/taste and the mind, we shall a struggle the rank that is due to us, but that illusion of material ; might is causing us to lose;. the; firfet. •
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19390111.2.134
Bibliographic details
Otago Daily Times, Issue 23704, 11 January 1939, Page 12
Word Count
1,197PLACE OF FRANCE Otago Daily Times, Issue 23704, 11 January 1939, Page 12
Using This Item
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Otago Daily Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.