COURT REPORTS
LIABILITY OF NEWSPAPERS POSITION DEFINED SYDNEY, June 22. (Received June 22, at 11.50 p.m.) The Chief Justice (Sir Frederick Jordan) to-day, in a judgment in the Full Court, defined the liability of newspapers which publish summarised versions of court proceedings, leading to contempt of court. Sir Frederick said that, provided the summaries are fair and accurate, the newspapers enjoy the same protection from contempt of court as do verbatim reports. "As a general rule, the courts cannot accommodate all who desire to hear the proceedings in certain cases Consequently the public have to depend on the newspapers for their reports, and, as long as the published account is fair, accurate, and in good faith, without malice, nobody can complain. I hold, further, that a summary cannot be regarded as unfair by reason only of the fact that it has failed to draw attention to a feature to which no prominence was given before the magistrate in the lower court." The judgment arose out of an action against the Daily Telegraph by Richard Terrill. who complained that the published summary of the court proceedings omitted to mention features favourable to him.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19370623.2.110
Bibliographic details
Otago Daily Times, Issue 23224, 23 June 1937, Page 10
Word Count
192COURT REPORTS Otago Daily Times, Issue 23224, 23 June 1937, Page 10
Using This Item
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Otago Daily Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in