Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SHOULD DOCTORS TELL?

HOUSE OF COMMONS BILL LONDON, Feb. 5. Members of the House of Commons showed no sympathy for the plea that doctors should not tell, and negatived without a division a Bill permitting doctors to refrain from disclosing in courts of law confidential information from their oatients. Simultaneously, the British Medical Journal expresses the opinion that without the patient’s consent no doctor should voluntarily disclose information from a patient. The answer should be “ No,” even if it means gaol for contempt

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19370208.2.67

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 23109, 8 February 1937, Page 9

Word Count
83

SHOULD DOCTORS TELL? Otago Daily Times, Issue 23109, 8 February 1937, Page 9

SHOULD DOCTORS TELL? Otago Daily Times, Issue 23109, 8 February 1937, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert