Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE LAW’S LONG ARM

CRIME OF,TWENTY-THREE YEARS AGO

Twelve judges sat in Edinburgh High Court in July to give judgment on the appeal of a Leith man who was sentenced to 14 days’ imprisonment for bigamy committed 23 years ago. The appeal raised the question whether there was “prescription” of _ crime in the law of Scotland. “Prescription” is a word employed in Scottish law in the sense in which “ limitation ” is used in England and America to express that operation of the lapse of time by which obligations are extinguished or titles protected. It was argued on the man’s behalf that be could not be prosecuted, and a decision of 1773 was invoked in support of that argument. The court, however, by a majority dismissed the appeal, holding that there was no prescription of crime in Scotland.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19340912.2.135

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 22365, 12 September 1934, Page 12

Word Count
137

THE LAW’S LONG ARM Otago Daily Times, Issue 22365, 12 September 1934, Page 12

THE LAW’S LONG ARM Otago Daily Times, Issue 22365, 12 September 1934, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert