Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TEST CRICKET

BODYLINE CONTROVERSY NOW REGARDED AS DEAD (United Press Association.) (By Electric Telegraph—Copyright.) LONDON, December 12. The critics and the newspapers agree that Marylebone has spoken the last word in a barren controversy. The Star says: “It is clear that there will be no bowling at the man in the next tests. The issue is dead. The Australians ought to let it lie down. M.C.C. TEAM IN INDIA. MATCH AGAINST BOMBAY CITY. CALCUTTA, December 12. Bombay City in its first innings made 140 (Mitchell two for none). Marylebone has lost onb wicket for 66. MORNING POST COMMENT. 1 LONDON, December 13. (Received Dec. 13, at 10 p.m.) The Morning Post says: “As both sides are half way back to the pavilion a few members of the Board of Control shout, ‘ Wait, we must send along a final over.’ They did, and it has been summarily dealt with by the M.C.C. Even partisans of Australia admit that the last delivery. was superfluous and like asking for a sixpenny stamp on a gentleman’s agreement. Weather experts are saying that in 1934 there will be another good summer. Of course the Australians will come and we shall be as pleased as Punch to see them. When they are here with the sun shining bodyline bowling and the leg theory will sound like something Gladstone said in 1883. It is nearly time we began to worry over that everlasting problem of the opening pair.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19331214.2.78

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 22136, 14 December 1933, Page 9

Word Count
241

TEST CRICKET Otago Daily Times, Issue 22136, 14 December 1933, Page 9

TEST CRICKET Otago Daily Times, Issue 22136, 14 December 1933, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert