Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE DICTATORS

HITLER AND MUSSOLINI ■ AMUSING CONTRASTS. Mr G. K. Chesterton, in a recent address', discussed Fascism and Hitlerism in .very entertaining style. “ Mussolini may have been right or wrong,” he said, “ but what he said was, ‘ Pull yourselves together, you Italians. You must not be known as a lot of people who make confectionery and macaroni and Venetian glass. To-day you are being laughed at for being a nation of fruiterers and ice cream vendors, You have got to be a new kind of people: Citizens like those of the ancient city States.’ ” “ Mussolini did not flatter them,” ho continued. “He did not tell them that they were great and glorious simply because they were Latins. “But this attitude was reversed in the case of Hitler. He was busy telling a partially civilised people what a wonderful nation they were. He was not telling the Germans that they were a lot of pudding-face sausages of men and women, who had to pull themselves together and be rational and useful citizens. He was telling them to remember the pride of their largely barbaric tribe, and how they had trampled on the French and the Poles.” LATIN CHARACTERISTICS. The emergence of Fascism was primarily due, said Mr Chesterton, to Latin impatience and intelligence. Their peculiar type of impatience has been shown on other important occasions. The French Revolution was a perfectly good example of it. “For a long time before the French Revolution, English and Germans, and eveu the Russians, had been deploring the wickedness of the general state of things, but it was France that struck.” The revolution of Mussolini differed in essentials from that now at work in Germany, he went on. So many people imagined that the two movements were fundamentally similar. The Italian movement was one of reform. The movement in Germany almost amounted to an organised boasting that reform was unnecessary, that it was impossible to improve on the Nordic type. “ It must be remembered,” declared Mr Chesterton, “ that Italy is a country that has been civilised for many centuries. Compared with the civilisation of Italy, the civilisation of the Germans is partial and immature. “LITTLE CROOKED CROSS.” “I do not think much of Hitler’s funny little crooked cross,” he continued, “ and his ranting and romantic quotations from Nietscho. Yet there is a great deal to be said for poor old Hitler. It is part of a great movement for Q return of order in human government. “ The only alternative seems to be Communism, which annoys me because it is so abominably dull. Just think of all the machinery it involves.” The likelihood of Fascism ever becoming a serious political force in England wa* discounted by Mr Chesterton.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19330714.2.21

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 22005, 14 July 1933, Page 5

Word Count
452

THE DICTATORS Otago Daily Times, Issue 22005, 14 July 1933, Page 5

THE DICTATORS Otago Daily Times, Issue 22005, 14 July 1933, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert