Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BASED ON A FALLACY

RECOMMENDATION OPPOSED STATE FOREST DEPARTMENT. An extract from the presidential address at the annual meeting of the New Zealand Institute of Foresters, deals with the Forestry Department: “ During the past year the Economy Commission recommended that when, shortly, the Dominion’s State plantations are, to quote the words of the commission’s report, ‘ reduced to a maintenance basis ’ —that is, consolidated and rounded off —the Forest Department be amalgamated with another State Department. Such action would deal a crushing blow to the fundamental aim and object of the institute —namely, furthering the development of technical forestry in New Zealand, for it would destroy the traditions of the State Forest Department. Moreover, the recommendation is based on the fallacy that what is termed the maintenance period of the plantations demands less unified and direct control and less skilful management, whereas on the contrary it is a period in the development of plantations when skilful silvicultural tending and systematic _ management demand no reduction in trained personnel. “ Repeated efforts over a number of years to destroy the United States Forest Service by transferring it to the Department of the Interior were during the past year finally abandoned. After the full criticism to which forestry was subjected in that country during the past few years, forestry has come out on top. Let us hope that technical forestry in New Zealand will be equally successful. “ We must not be disheartened by the present slump conditions; the very fact that in times of crisis men’s minds are unsettled renders them more receptive and adjustable to quick changes for the better, and why not in technical forestry?" r

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19330513.2.120

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 21952, 13 May 1933, Page 18

Word Count
273

BASED ON A FALLACY Otago Daily Times, Issue 21952, 13 May 1933, Page 18

BASED ON A FALLACY Otago Daily Times, Issue 21952, 13 May 1933, Page 18

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert