Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PARTY FLAVOUR.

APPOINTMENT OF JUDGES. AUSTRALIAN DANGER.' (Fbou Oos Owh Coeeespondekt.) SYDNEY, December 11. With the elevation of Sir Isaac Isaacs, Chief Justice of Australia, to the position of Governor-General of the Commonwealth, there are three vacancies on the Federal High Court Bench, and the manner in which this extraordinary position is being discussed in political Labour circles has caused a distinct feeling of distrust among those who desire to keep the courts free from political contamination. Never before in the history of the Commonwealth has the Government had the opportunity of making three appointments to the Bench simultaneously, and there has developed a strong demand from the Labour Caucus that the Government should take full advantage of the opportunity. The propaganda, as it has been termed, can mean only one thing, it is held—that the Government should appoint only those who have Labour sympathies. For some time past Labour politicians have made no secret of the fact that they have not been satisfied with the manner in which the High Court has interpreted the Constitution. Attacks on the High Court have been frequent in Parliament, and have invariably been voiced by the extremists—those' men who even now are endeavouring to foist inflation and repudiation on the Commonwealth. They have openly declared that it was about time the High Court was composed of men who would interpret the Constitution as Labour would have it, so the bright thought has occurred to them to' select as judges men who have been strong Labour supporters. It is natural, therefore, that a feeling of suspicion should have arisen. There are many who fear a policy of spoils to the victors. If such a policy were adopted as far as the judiciary were concerned the High Court would lose the confidence of the public. It is not likely that any appointment will he made until the return of the Prime Minister (Mr Scullin). The Acting Prime Minister (Mr Fenton), it is said, realises the delicacy of the situation, and would prefer to wait. The extremists on the other hand have no desire to force the position, and so reveal their attitude to the fullest degree. Two Labour stalwarts are mentioned as likely to succeed Sir Isaac Isaacs. One of these is Dr Evatt, K.C., a particularly brilliant man, who has been a member of the State Labour Party in New South Wales for years, and a member of the Assembly. The other is a Labour member of the Federal House, Mr A. E. M‘Tiernan. It is generally felt that if the Labour Government retains power the new Chief Justice will be GovernorGeneral in five years’ time, so the significance of any appointment now is increased.

To anyone but a Labour politican it would seem that a very delicate position had arisen.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19301220.2.4

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 21214, 20 December 1930, Page 2

Word Count
467

PARTY FLAVOUR. Otago Daily Times, Issue 21214, 20 December 1930, Page 2

PARTY FLAVOUR. Otago Daily Times, Issue 21214, 20 December 1930, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert