Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PUBLIC SERVICE SALARY CUTS.

W UIE EUITOB. Sir,—ln connection with "my letter on the above subject, which appeared in your columns on November 29, I have been awaiting "the arrival of authoritative ■ figures for" which I wrote in order to make' a correction if necessary.’ Apparently by some mischance the information 'has not _ yet come to hand, but, on the assumption that, your higher figures are correct, then I would be in error in say- . ing " some of whose salaries reached four figures.” I should have said."in salaries up to £80.0.”. Your own figures show—• taking them us applying to, the first cut and-then adding the amount of the second cnt^—that there was no attempt at a proportionate reduction between bare-living salaries and salaries nearing £BOO. The' reduction in. a salary of, say. £235 was altogether disproportionate to the reduction in a salary, of, say, £750. The bitterness in the ..minds, of the lower grade public servants- over this matter is based on the fact of .this disproportion, along with 1 the knowledge that the highly-paid men could get a restoration of the salary quts under the name of reclassification or regrading, while hundreds of the men oq whom the reductions pressed most heavily have never had a penny of the salary, cuts restored to' them by. regrading,' though Reform politicians seem fond of saying that they have. Your lower figures, given in yotir footnote to my letter,-were certainly quite misleading. Yr>»i afterwards aditiitted to another correspondent that you .gave the figures for the first cut only.-_ But tliis- was' -surely' beside the (I'ioation, when the matter/-1 waswriting about I 'was . the effect, of. the- two cuts.. And, even then’ the reductibn you" give for the' grade T,belonged to myself -represents, not the £ls-of: the first ’cut, but the £lO of the second cuti—l am, etc., - ~ . , .... .P. Malthos. Hillgroye, .December 10. [The statement by -our correspondent that be was in error on the assumption that pup ..higher • figures, wgre correct is gratuitous. Our ■ correspondent has relied on : his memory, -Whereas, we have quoted . the terms ' of' the statute.— E». O.D.T.j • ,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19291213.2.90.2

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 20899, 13 December 1929, Page 15

Word Count
350

PUBLIC SERVICE SALARY CUTS. Otago Daily Times, Issue 20899, 13 December 1929, Page 15

PUBLIC SERVICE SALARY CUTS. Otago Daily Times, Issue 20899, 13 December 1929, Page 15

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert