Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CONFLICT OF EVIDENCE.

INSPECTOR v. CONSTABLE. MAGISTRATE UPHOLDS CONSTABLE. (Special to Dailx Times.) AUCKLAND, April 18. A feature of a case heard m the Motrintville MaS'trate'a Court, to-day was that"a police inspector, and a.Hamilton traffic inspector gave evidence *";»»£* fence against that given by stable and a local traffic inspector for the prosecution. . A Hamilton taxr driver Alec Hutcheson, was charged With driving! ft a dangerous speed through Mornnsvjlle Bo Sence waa given W> Mr Branch traffic inspector, and Constable Heepes that a trap was set m Mornnsville on the morning of the Te Aroha races. A distance of 547 yards was paced ott. me inspector stood with a stopwatch, at one end while Constable Heepea had a wateM at the other end, and took a note ot the times and the number pi the cars. It was stated Hutcheson drove through the trap at a speed which the witnesses described as dangerous. Inspector Eccles,.officer in charge of the Hamilton police district, who passenger in Hutcheson's car, sar that at no time did the defendant exceed the speed limit, and Le had driven most carefully. Witness considered that the • tests were wrong. . ' , Patrick Courtney, traffic inspector at Hamilton, described the method employed by Branch and Constable Heepes js crude and stupid and said it was impossible, to pruge accurately the speed of cars passing through the trap. • The Magistrate (Mr R. L. Patterson) held that Hutcheson had travelled at a dangerous speed, and imposed a fine of £1 10s. His Worship admitted that the trap was a crude one, but said that the test was sufficiently accurate for all practical | purposes. He gave the defendant the i benefit of five miles an hour. , Thirtv-one other defendants, who were | caught in the trap, and who did not appear, were fined varying amounts.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19280420.2.13

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 20388, 20 April 1928, Page 4

Word Count
300

CONFLICT OF EVIDENCE. Otago Daily Times, Issue 20388, 20 April 1928, Page 4

CONFLICT OF EVIDENCE. Otago Daily Times, Issue 20388, 20 April 1928, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert