Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ARBITRATION SYSTEM

PROFESSOR TOCKER’S VIEWS. FAILURE TO ENSURE PEACE. (FnM Association —By Telegraph—Copyright ) MELBOURNE, January 24. Explaining the system of compulsory arbitration in New Zealand Professor Tocker, of Canterbury College, in an address to the members of the Victorian Chamber of Manufacturers, expressed the opinion that the system had failed to do the things which it was created to do. He advocated a return to collective bargaining between employers and employees. Industry in a young country should be flexible, and the adjustments mutually satisfactrry to employers and employees. “It should be made to suit the conditions in particular branches of industry,” continued Professor Tocker. The Arbitration Court is a piece of legal machinery set up between the in industry which prevents their coming together, and forces them both to organise for contention rather than for conciliation.” . Processor Tocker said that in New Zealand compulsory arbitration was introduced 30 years ago, primarily with the object of ensuring industrial peace. In that it had failed, especially in receut years. From 1921 until this year strikes had become increasingly common. The court had developed along lines never intended, and its effects had never been fully considered. While the scope of the court’s investigations was unmeet to the conditions of only about one-fourth of the wage-ea-ners of the community, it made awards which were binding over a far larger field, and it had a profound influence on other industries, as the minimum wage fixed by the court became in almost every case the _ standard ge. No increases were provided for skill or productivity, and no allowance was made for human variability. Disputes were frequently created to give the court work to do. Industry was bound in a straitjacket which prevented experiments, decreased production, and increased costs. The burden arising out of the system ultimately fell upon the shoulders of the consumers and on the unsheltered primary industries.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19280125.2.40

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 20315, 25 January 1928, Page 7

Word Count
313

ARBITRATION SYSTEM Otago Daily Times, Issue 20315, 25 January 1928, Page 7

ARBITRATION SYSTEM Otago Daily Times, Issue 20315, 25 January 1928, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert