ARBITRATION SYSTEM
PROFESSOR TOCKER’S VIEWS. FAILURE TO ENSURE PEACE. (FnM Association —By Telegraph—Copyright ) MELBOURNE, January 24. Explaining the system of compulsory arbitration in New Zealand Professor Tocker, of Canterbury College, in an address to the members of the Victorian Chamber of Manufacturers, expressed the opinion that the system had failed to do the things which it was created to do. He advocated a return to collective bargaining between employers and employees. Industry in a young country should be flexible, and the adjustments mutually satisfactrry to employers and employees. “It should be made to suit the conditions in particular branches of industry,” continued Professor Tocker. The Arbitration Court is a piece of legal machinery set up between the in industry which prevents their coming together, and forces them both to organise for contention rather than for conciliation.” . Processor Tocker said that in New Zealand compulsory arbitration was introduced 30 years ago, primarily with the object of ensuring industrial peace. In that it had failed, especially in receut years. From 1921 until this year strikes had become increasingly common. The court had developed along lines never intended, and its effects had never been fully considered. While the scope of the court’s investigations was unmeet to the conditions of only about one-fourth of the wage-ea-ners of the community, it made awards which were binding over a far larger field, and it had a profound influence on other industries, as the minimum wage fixed by the court became in almost every case the _ standard ge. No increases were provided for skill or productivity, and no allowance was made for human variability. Disputes were frequently created to give the court work to do. Industry was bound in a straitjacket which prevented experiments, decreased production, and increased costs. The burden arising out of the system ultimately fell upon the shoulders of the consumers and on the unsheltered primary industries.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19280125.2.40
Bibliographic details
Otago Daily Times, Issue 20315, 25 January 1928, Page 7
Word Count
313ARBITRATION SYSTEM Otago Daily Times, Issue 20315, 25 January 1928, Page 7
Using This Item
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Otago Daily Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.