Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE BUS WAR.

CARGILL'S CORNER INCIDENT.

Now ihnt the Exhibition is over tho famous bus warfare between tho hosts of toe Cn v Corporation and the army of private owners is practically a thing of the past. However an echo of that stirring struggle for public patronage «as heard before Mr LI, W. Bundle, S.M., in the Police Court yesterday, when n vaunt; private bus driver, William Cecil Hope (Mr A. C. Hanlon) was charged with negligently driving an omnibus at Cargill’s Corner on .»pril 6. Edward Francis Mason, aged 16, said he was standing at Cargill s Corner at a quarter to 6 and April 6, and witnessed the incident. lie hoard horns blown and saw a private bus following a corporation bus up the road The corporation bus drew up and tho private bus ran into it. from (lie rear. It had been travelling about six vards behind the corporation bus "hen h was coming up the road. John Anthony Cunningham, bus driver in tho employ of the corporation, said he was on the Anderson's Ray run and shortly after passing the private bus bad drawn up on the side of the road, where lie was ceil men with from the rear. Senior Sergeant Quartermain; ' Was it vonr duty to follow that private bus all over the place that day:” Witness exchanged grins and a wink with defendant, staling that two private buses wore following him. “It was my duty to follow the private bus anywhere except on (he tram routes." lie added. Witness continued that after pulling np be felt, a slight bump. Defendant, and his brother got out of their bus one of them remarking that be hud “got" witness now ami desired to «end for the police. Pie was in tho wrong for not giving the signal to slop. , Mr Hanlon submitted that there w-ns no case to answei —the accident was probably due to the failure of the corporation bus driver to give the signal to stop. His Worship aid that the evidence d d not show nnv negligence on the part of defendant. The case was dismissed.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19260508.2.109

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 19784, 8 May 1926, Page 21

Word Count
354

THE BUS WAR. Otago Daily Times, Issue 19784, 8 May 1926, Page 21

THE BUS WAR. Otago Daily Times, Issue 19784, 8 May 1926, Page 21

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert