Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Thitrsday, Janttary 10. (Before Mr H. W. Bundle, S.M.) Undefended Casas. —Judgment by default was given in the following oases:— T. A. MfEwen (Burnside) v. Cecil Dunn (Burnside). £6 9s 6d, for goods supplied (costs 18s); Neill and Co. (Ltd.) v. W. W. Pjintz (Invercargill), £2B 11s lid, for goods supplied (costs £3 16s); Andrew Lees (Ltd.) v. Arthur Hay (Timaru), £42 18s sd, duo on promissory note (costs £4 2s 6d); Guthrie, Bowron, and Co. (Ltd.) v. E. Reynolds (Ashburton), £26 Is lid, due on account (costs £3 Is); Butterworth Bros. (Ltd.) v. E. W. Read (Christchurch), £2 2s, balance for goods (costs £1 8s 6d).

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19240111.2.22

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 19066, 11 January 1924, Page 4

Word Count
109

MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Otago Daily Times, Issue 19066, 11 January 1924, Page 4

MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Otago Daily Times, Issue 19066, 11 January 1924, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert