Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Tuesday, May 1. (Before Mr J. R. Bartholomew, S.M.I

Judgment was given for plaintiffs in the following undefended cases:—City Drapery Store v; Alexander John Allan, £5 ss, balance for drapery (costs £1 10s fid) ; James R. White v. M. S, Cuttle (Temuka). judgment for costs (£1 14s); J. PI. Walker v. James Cavahagh (Lawrence), £3 5s hire of a taxi (costs £1 7s fid); Barningham and Company v. Harriet HLall (St. Kilda), 19s for work and material (costs 10s) ; J. Hendry and Co, v. E. Ireson (Wellington),’ £2 10s for clothes (costs £1 3a fid); Dawsons (Ltd.) v, W. Burke (Middlemarch), £2 fis for work done and goods supplied (costs £1 4g fid): Lutterworth Bros. v. Jane Hay vice (Wellington), £75 12s Id for goods (costs £4 17s) C W. Small v. Leslie Smith, £1 17s 3d. money lent (costs 8s); Maiden and Barr v ii. Ireson (Wellington), £l2 9s for good* and repairs (costs £2 14s); Siedeberg v. W. Weaver (Wellington), £4 10s on a promissory note (costs 8s); Downie Stewart and Bayne v. John Little (Kaitangata). £27 10s 3d for legal expenses incurred (costs £2 13); Fraser and Company v. John N. ihomson (St. Clair), £34 Is 4d for poultry, etc. (costs £4 Is fid); H. V. Haddock v. c. Clark (Palmerston), £27 12s fid for timber (costs £3 4s); it. S. Black v. William Hill (Ida Valley), £23 5s for money lent (costs £3 14s). Somerville and Sons v. William Gorden (Balclutha), claim £lB fis Id on a judgment summons.—An order was made varying a former judgment, the payment to now be 15s a week,

James M’Mullan v. Alfred Wallis (Burnside), claim £7 11s fid on a judgment summons.—Mr Moore appeared for the judgment creditor, and after‘defendant had been examined on oath his Worship refused to make an order.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19230502.2.12

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 18851, 2 May 1923, Page 3

Word Count
304

MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Otago Daily Times, Issue 18851, 2 May 1923, Page 3

MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Otago Daily Times, Issue 18851, 2 May 1923, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert