Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A BETTING TRANSACTION

IMPORTANT JUDGMENT. (Per United Phess Association-.) CHRISTCHURCH, January 26. An important judgment was delivered at Oxford by Mr Bailey, S.M., bearing upon totalisator investments. William Femvick sought to recover from Keith (limn £26 9s, plaintiff alleging that lie gave Oiinn £2 to invest on a horse at the New Brighton trots. The horse won, and Gunu paid over only the dividend on a £1 ticket, returning the remaining pound to plaintiff. Defendant contended that the matter was to be left to the owner's discretion, and the latter invested only £1. Mr Bailey held that it was established" that only £1 was invested, and plaintiff could not succeed. He also held that as the transaction between plaintiff and defendant was illegal, plaintiff could not recover under section 53 of "The Gamintr Act, 1908."

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19150128.2.68

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 16293, 28 January 1915, Page 6

Word Count
135

A BETTING TRANSACTION Otago Daily Times, Issue 16293, 28 January 1915, Page 6

A BETTING TRANSACTION Otago Daily Times, Issue 16293, 28 January 1915, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert