MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
Thursday, August 13. (Before Mr H. Y. Widdowson, S.M.) Judgment was given by default in the following cases:—Georgo T. K. M'Kenz'ft v. James Hughes (vVaimate),' claim £1 8a 4d, for goods supplied (costs ss); .William Croasan .v. Alexander Bain (Balclutha), claim £2 16s 6d, for liquor supplied (costs 10s); Johnston, Sons, and Co. v. Lillian Trenoith, claim £2 2s 6d, cost of boot (costs 12s); same v. Oscar Eugene Gallie (Masterton), claim 16s (costs ss); save v. Edward Baines (Ormondville), claim £2 12s 6d teosts 10s); same v. Archibald Morris Hynn (Palmereton North), claim £2 4s (costs 10s); same- v. Charles Oliver Ernest Broad (Upper Hutt), "claim £4 4s (costs 10s); same v. Harold Chas. Bignell (Mangapapa), claim £1 17s 6d (costs ss); same v. Harold Hambling (Woodville), claim £l 2s (costs ss); samo v. Leicester Gnbbie (Auckland), claim £1 7s (costs 7e); same v. iStephi'n b. Hurd (Epsom), claim £2 8s (costs 13s); Marshall's Proprietary v. J. H. Ward (Onehunga), claim £7 5s 3d, goods and amount of a dishonoured cheque (costs £1 3s 6d); same v. Guetav Hahn (Ahaura), claim £11 10s 4d (costs £1 10s 6d); Rosa Collier v. Henry Hollander, claim £4 14s 6d, medical attendance (costs lis); John Edward Butler v. Leonard M. Jenkins (Shannon), claim £28 12s, for promissory notes (costs £2 14s); James Hendry v. C. J. H. Thomson (Milton), claim £10 6s, clothes supplied (costs £l 10s 6d); David Porter Wilson v. Percy William Wates (Herbert), claim £7 (costs £1 3s 6d); A. H. B. Poulter and Co. v. Alexander Jordan, claim 16s 9d. boots supplied (costs ss); same v. Alexander Lees, claim 10s 6d (costs ss); Dunedin Grain and Produce Company v. Bobert Robert.', claim 3s 6d, costs in action since settled; same v. Charles Deans, claim £1 lis 4d (costs ss); J. and J. Arthur v. John Ede, claim £3 5s (costs lis); A. E. Asherwood and Co. v. Thos. D. Simpson (Albury), olaim £8 14s 3d (costs £1 12s 6d); D.I.C. v. William Gye (Clyde), claim £13 4s 6d (costs £1 10s 6d).
Judgment Summons. —Thomas Scurr r. Charles Deans on a judgment summons for the sum of £1 14s 6d.—The defendant did not appear.—His Worship made an order that the defendant pay the amount forthwith, with costs (ss), in default two .Jays' imprisonment.
New Zealand Express Company v. Robert Fleming, claim £6 10s lid, for cartage, telegram, freight, and disbursements.—Mr E. J. Smith appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr A. C. Stephens for the defendant.—After hearing evidence, judgment was given for plaintiff, his Worship holding that thero was sufficient evidence of an instruction to the Express Company to pay the railway charges incurred, which were part of the subject of action. Costs (£2 6s) were allowed.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19140814.2.12
Bibliographic details
Otago Daily Times, Issue 16152, 14 August 1914, Page 3
Word Count
460MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Otago Daily Times, Issue 16152, 14 August 1914, Page 3
Using This Item
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Otago Daily Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.