Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

IMPERIAL POLITICS.

NAVAL PRIZE BILL. SECOND READING DEBATE. "Presa Association—By Telegraph—Copyright. LONDON, June 29. In the House of Commons Mr M'Kinnon Wood, in moving the second reading of the Naval Prize Bill, said: "If wo refuse to ratify it we shall run the risk of having food declared absolute contraband. We should have,to build moro Dreadnoughts, and there would be an end of the hope of limitation of armaments." He attached great importance- to tlio oversea dominions' Prinio Ministers' approval of the Declaration in its broad aspects. Mr Wood added sarcastically that their opponents said much Ices about the opinions of the Dominions' representatives since- their approval had been gained for the Declaration. Amid cheers and counter-cheers ho deprecated the use of the dominions as pawns in the party game. It was impossible to defer ratification until a'Royal Commission had confirmed the Declaration. He added that Admiral Wilson and Admiral FisheT and four previous Directors of Naval Intelligence favoured tho Declaration, and their opinions carried more weight than thesa of Assenting Admirals. Sir R. B. Finlay, K.C., derided the notion that the Declaration of London would end tho competition of armaments. The proposed constitution of the Prize Court was outrageous. Incompletely surrendered British principles on questions of contraband and the destruction of neutrals. Though Great Britain had tho support of America and Japan, article 20 was simply <an adoption of the German draft. Ratification of the Declaration would be a national calamity. The Government has granted an additional day for the Prisw Bill debate, but hopes to terminate it on Monday. Th'<> First Lord of the Admiralty, Mr" M'Kenna, said the Declaration did not Ibind Great Britain in the slightest as regards allowing belligerent rights to merchantmen which were converted into cruisers on the high seas. The court had no jurisdiction as between belligerents. J'he Declaration affected neutrals atone. Be added: "If wo were at war with, a Power which had converted her merchantmen into warships on tho sea, then Ave should bo free to deal with those merchantmen as before the signing of the Declaration "

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19110701.2.58

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 15184, 1 July 1911, Page 9

Word Count
346

IMPERIAL POLITICS. Otago Daily Times, Issue 15184, 1 July 1911, Page 9

IMPERIAL POLITICS. Otago Daily Times, Issue 15184, 1 July 1911, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert