MAGISTRATE'S COURT

Otago Daily Times, Issue 14703, 10 December 1909, Page 7

MAGISTRATE'S COURT

Thursday, December 9. (Before Mr H. Y. Widdowson, S.M.) ' Judgment was entered for phimtiifs by default iii tho following uudefeiidedi cases: — Johnston, Sons, and Co. (Mr Monro) v. Arthur T. Clark. (Chrislcliurch), claim £1 17s, balance on account stated (costs 15s); ,A. Moritaon and l'o. -Mr Hayl v. H. L. Jennings and Co, (Uisborno), claim £6 S« 10<l, on account stated (costs 23s 6d); Isailoie S. De Jleor (Mr -Moore) v Frederick T. Tictjens (lokomtiru), claim £2 2s lid, on account ttut«l (costs 10s); Hondai Lanka Tea Comliany (Mr Moure).-v. Elisabeth Dovle, chum £4 10s, on account stated (costs 10s); Johnston, Sons, and Co (Mr Scautlebury) v. Lrnest Henry Hurley (Cliristchurch), claim on account stated (costs 7s); Johnston, S ur"t,- and Co -' v - Harold F - S - Charlsworth (Wellington), claim £6 6s, on account staled (costs 25s 6tl); Johnston, Sons, and Co. v. Niliam .Cordon (Auckland), claim £4 14s Od, on account stated (costs lis); Johnston, Sons, and Co. v. Henry Hogg (lialclutha), claim 103 6d, on account stated' (costs ss); Johnston, Sons, and Co. v. Walter Charles Manatoti (Fairlic), claim £3 ss, on account slated (costs 10s); Johnston, Sous, and Co. v. David Moore (Auckland), claim £4 14 s 6d, on account stated (costs 14s); Johnston, Sons, and Co. v. Edwin and Nora StocMcv (Auckland), claim £4 lis 6d, on account stated (costs 19s): Johnston, Sous, and Co. v. Ernest Syms (Thames), claim Si 14s 6d' on account stated (costs 10s); Johnston] Sons, and Co. v. John Walls (Fo.xton), claim.£2 Bs, on account stated (costs 10s); Johnston, Sons, and Co. v. C. Jack Winder (Thames), claim £4 14s fed, on account stated (costs 10s); Willinin Crossan (Mr Hay) v. William I'\ Bannatyne, claim £46 lis 3d, money l<pit and paid by plaintiff at request of defendant (costs £3 6s): Thomas H. Dunham (Mr Moore) v. Colin Campbell, claim £5 5?, on account stated (ccsU 23s 6d): W. Secular (Mr W. C. WacGrcgor) v. Patrick J.'Rodgors (Lowburn). claim £18 5s ICd, on dishonoured promissory note and intcrrtst (costs 23s 6d); Taieri and Ponin. sula Milk Supply Company. Ltd. (Mr 0. K. Sliifham) v.-'Frederick Scarle. claim £3 17s 7d, on account, stated (ccsts lfjs); Kicks and Co. (Mr P. Thomson) v. W. J. Bannatyne (Chrislcliurclil. claim £18 10s. on account Mated (costs £1 Ifts 6(1); Stmlinn and Co. 'Mr \V. C. MacC.regor) v F. W. Merer IRcdelilM. claim £49 10s. on account jt.-it.-d K<ts £3 17.s 6d); Slaujhtcrins Union v. "■Smith, claim £1 17s 6d, subscription to union (costs 8s). breach of an A ward.-Joseph Hollows (Inspector of Awards) v. John Jackson "•"lie, claim £10 pcna.ltv for breach of tho carters' award' in that defendant did pay to Joseph Photon, a carter in his employ, \*\„„ over th „ a „ c of 20 years. ""tos at the rate of 25s |e« r week, instead : per week as provided bv the award— •;Ac:ims who appeared for defendant. •'■- Hint the facts were n s stated, but it •■ a mere technical br«eh. Prolan, who ■ and physirallv weal;, had syine •;! r l«"lie and asked for work.' Mr ■■-•-:o had by mistake S o„e to Mr Havnios .'"T"' of Mr 1.0 Orron to ask for'pei■■fsion N. work the man at the lower raw. and had understood that .-ermine- ' ?d ,wn "J?"'," 1 This - 110w "-or. wn< iMhe case-M, I* f>a «iM,,j ilt Mr ,\,, 811 . k W staled the op'c very clearlv.-A penally «i 5s -was imposed, '

Judgment Summons.—James Stenhouso (Mr Hay) v. Patrick Hogan, claim £27 Is on a judgment summons.—Defendant did not appear and an order was raado for payment [orlhwith, with costs (£2 lis 6d)i in default two months' imprisonment.