LAWN TENNIS
DRAW FOR. the SEASON.
(he following j s the draw for tho 1909-10 season in the banner matches as arranged by the Match Committee of the Otago Lawn Tennis Association, In .some caws it will bo noticed that a club has to play on its own courts on two successive Saturdays. This is entirely unavoidable, and will bo <iuile rceogiusoil by the clubs in question: —
A Gkade. MUST EOU.M).
November 6.-Kaituna ,-.' University, at Ailltunii; loi't \ Balniacewen. at Port; Otago a bye.
November 20.—Kuituna \. Balniacewen, at Halmacowen; Port v. Otago, -t Port; University a bye.
December 4.—Kahuna r. Otago, at Otago; Dnliiiacswcii v University, at' University; Fort a bye.
December 18.—Kaifcunn v. Port, at Port • Otago v. University, at Olago; Balmi-Mwon a bye.
January 15.—Port, v. University, at I'm. vcrsity;_OUgo v Baliuacev.c-i|., at Baimacewen; Kail una a bye.
SECOND ItOEXD.
J January 23.—Kaituna v. Univeisity, at University: Port v. Balmoccwen, at Balmaccwen; Otago a bye. FoLniary 12—Ka-ituna v. Balmacowen, at Kaituna; Port v Otago, at Otaro; University a. bye. February 26.—Kaituna. "v. Otago, at Kaituna: Baimacewen v. University, at Baimacewen; Port a, bye.
Ma.rch 12.—Kaituna- v. Port, at Port' Otago v University, at University; Balmacowen a bye.
March 2fi.—Port v. University, at Port; Otago v. Balmacowen, at Otago; Kaituna a bye.
B GBADE
November 6.—Kaituna v. Baimacewen, at Baimacewen; Otago v North-Bash Valley, at North-East Valley; University v Mosgiel, at Mcsgiel; lioslyn v. Anderson's Bay, at Anderson's Bav.: St Kilda a bye Novembsr 20.—Kaituna v North-East Valley, at Kaituna; Otago v. Mosgiel, at Otago; University v. Anderson's Bay. at University; Roslyn v. St. Kilda, at Roslyn; Balma.ccwen a. bye.
December 4.—Kaituna v. Mosgiel, at Mosgiel; Otago v. Anderson's Bay, at Anderson's Bay; University v. St Kilda, at St. Kilda; North-East Valley v Baimacewen, at Balmacowen; lioslyn a bye. January 15.—Kaituna v Anderson's Bav, at Kaituna.; Otago v. St Kilda, at Otago"; University v.-Roslyn, at University; Mcsgiel v. Balmacowen, at Mosgiel; North-East Valley a bye
January 29—Kaituna v. St. Kilda at Kaituna; Otago v. Roslyn, at Otago; Anderson s Bay v. Baimacewen, at Anderson's Bay; Mosgiel v. North-East Valley, at Mcsgiel; University a bye. \ February 12.-l{aituna- v. Roslyn, atRoslyn; Otago v. University, at University • St. Kilda v. Balniarcwen, at St. Kilda; Ande-rspn's Bay v. North-East Valley, at North-East Valley; Mosgiel a. bye. February 26.—Kaituna v. University, at University; Roslyn v. Baimacewen, at BalmaccirKi; St. Kilda v. North-East Valley, at Noitll-East Valley; Anderson's Bay v. Mcsgiel, at Mcsgiel; Otago a bye. March 12.—Kaituna v. Otago, at Otago; Univeisity v. Baimacewen, at University; Roslyn v. North-East Valley, at Roslyn; St. Kilda, v. Mosgiel, at St. Kilda; Anderson's Bay a bye. March 26.-Otago v. Bal.ma.Mwen, at Baimacewen.; University v. North-East Vallcv, at North-East Valley; Roslyn v Mosgiel, at Mosgiel; St. Kikla v. Anderson's Bav, at Andsreoi'.'s Bay; Kaituna u bye. C ("JKAOK. FIRST HOUND.
November 6.—aa,wytifi Bay v. North-' East Valley, at Sawyers' Bay; Roslyn v. Anderson's Bay, at Hcslyn; St. Kilda, v. Hanover, at Hanover. November 20.—Sawyers' Bay v. Anderson's Bay, at Anderson's Bay; Roslyn v St. Kilda, at St. Kilda; North-East Vallov, v. Hanover, at North-East Valley. December 4.—Sawyers' B„y v fit. Kilda, at Sawyers' Bay; Anderson's Bay, v. NorthEast Valley, at. North-East Valley; Roslyn v. Hanover, at Hanover. December 18.—Sabers' Bay v. Roslyn, at Koslyn; St. Kilda v. North-East Valley, at S,t. Kilda; Anderson's Bay, v. Hanover, at Hanover. January 15— Roslyn v. North-East Valley nt North-East Valley; St. Kilda. v. Anderson's Bay, at St. Kilda; Sawyers' Hay v. Hanover, at '.Sawyers' Bay. SECOXD lIOUXD. January 29.—Sawyers' Bav v. North-East Valley, at North-East Valley: Hcslyn v. Anderson's Bay, ait Koslyn; St. Kilda v. Hanover, at Hanover. February 12.-Sawyers' Bay v. Anderson's Bay, at Sawyers' Bay; Roslyn v. 'St. Kilda., at Roslyn; Norfh-Kast Valley v. Hanover, at Hanover. February 26—Sawyers' Bay v. St. Kilda, at' St. Kilda ;. Anderson's Bay v. NorthEast Valley, at Anderson'* Bay; Roslyn v. Hanover, at Roslyn. March 12.—Sawyers' Bav v. Rcslyn. at Sawyers' Bay; St. Kilda v. North-East Valley, at Norlh-Eost, Valley; Anderson's Bay v. Hanover, at Hanover." _. .March 26— Roslyn v. North-East Valley, at Roslyn; St. Kilda v. Anderson's Bay,' at, St. Kilda; Sawyers' Bay v. Hanover, at Sawyers' Bay. CANTERBURY v. OTAGO. The intorprovincial match Canterbury v. Otago will bo played on the Otago Club's courts on Monday, instead of Tuesday. The visiting team will arrive in Dunedin on Saturday by the second express.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19091102.2.14
Bibliographic details
Otago Daily Times, Issue 14670, 2 November 1909, Page 2
Word Count
729LAWN TENNIS Otago Daily Times, Issue 14670, 2 November 1909, Page 2
Using This Item
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Otago Daily Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.