MAGISTRATE'S COURT

Otago Daily Times, Issue 14244, 19 June 1908, Page 3

MAGISTRATE'S COURT

TIIURSDAr, JujfE 18. f (Before Mr.H. Y. Widdowson, S.M.) Judgment was givcn_for plaintiffs by default in tho Mowing cases:—W. L, Hooper v. Alfred Hoare, £7 ICte, amount of dishonourod promissory note, <wath costs 23s 6d; Georgoson Bros. (Mr Wilkinson) v. Edward Buddicomb, £7 16s 6d, goods supplied, with 23s' 6d costs; W. H.yris aud Son (Mr Arklc) v. Burt Wingfiold, £1 7s 6d, goods supplied, with 5s costs; W. Harris ajid iS'on (Mr Arkle) v. Geo. Golding, Ohristahurch, £1 4s, goods supplied, with Ss costs; Oollie and Pullon (Mr Arkle) v. Fredk. Hanson, 17s, goods supplied, with 7s costs;, Agnes E. King (Messrs Solomon. Gascoigne, and Hay) v. Geo. A. King, Ohristehurch, £78, maintcrunico duo under deed of separation, with £5 9s costs. Judgment Summons.—Logaa S. Donald v. A. Barnard, £8 4s 3d, amount duo on judgment summons. Order for immediate payment, wiMi 9s costs, in default. 14days' imprisonment. Robert M'Mullen and Co. v. J. Hatch and Go. (Invercargill), action to recover £5 13s 2d, value of produce supplied to tho Jessie Nreool in AuguEi last, less £3 19s 2d paid into court.—Mir F. G. Duncan (Duncan and MacGiregoij appeared for the plaintiff, who supplied potatoes and other produce for die use of defendant's men, and delivered them to the vessel while in Dunedin, for which receipts were given.— For tho defence it was contended that the goods were supplied to the order of the men themselves, and not on the order cf tlio owner. It was also contended that the produce was not,of good quality.—Alter bearing- evidence, his WoTship decided in favour of the plaintiff, holding that the goods were -put on board under instructions from those in authority on the ■vessel, and that any complaint as to qua-1% should have been made on delivery.—Judgment for balance claimed (£2 te), with £1 13s costs. ' Coaguline,' ' Klinx,' ' Tenasitine.'—Cements for broken and other articles.