MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
-T ' '♦ . ■ . MoiSIUV, SePTESiUER" 10. . (Before Mr 11.-Y. Wlddowson, S.U.j ■/ Judgment was given for plaintiffs, bv. default, in tho following caws;— Lottie We'dlake v. John Munro, c;aim J>2 lis Gd, fov goodi supplied (costs lie); Charles Begg and Co. v. Horaco Stewart (liolorua), claim £1 Ss 7d, lor goods sold and delivered (costs ss); Johnston. Sons, and Co. v. Arthur William Eftwards (Christcburch!. claim £6 Ga-fcosts £1 3s . W)j. S.,J Best and Co. v. Edwin Ilamw (Otautaii),'claim £0. 3s Bd, for goods supplied (costs £1 3s-Gel). Edg'nr Ju-ju* Thomson v. DichsrclXhnmly £4 13s, on a judgment sum- .. minis.—There \vm no appearance of (Wend- ! ■nt.' and no reason'tor tion-anpccrnr.ee.—An ' ordoi'Mvns made .that unless Om' amount- ' claimed,. >vhieh included costs amounting to is, 1» paid fortwlth. 'do.fcndanl bo imprisoned in Uuredin Gaol for seven days. '• 1). :stilliga-n v. Frank F. Hartnctt (Dunedin).—Claim £2 14s, on a judgment summons. --There was no appearance defendant and To reason for, iion-appearanoe.—The Magistrate luada an'order'that unless tljo amount claimed (£3 Hs); together with 5s costs, be paidforthwith, defontliut be imprisoned in, Duncdin Gao' for seven '3«vsA Robert Marshall" (Pino Hill) v, ''Frederick '. Morgan -(St. Leonards).—Claim: Gs, being I amount dijo to plaintiff on r.-: I 0 U giveit to ; : him by defendant on tho Sill of August Inst: .— Defendant put in a counter claim fo r 8?. being one day's wage due to him as an employee of ■ the plaintiff.—Mr Wilkinson appeared for plaintiff, riu! Mr Irwin for defendant.—The IOl) was admired, but defendant contended that i» day's wages (8s) \%s due to him by plaintiff.—His Worship, after. hht- !.. ing cviderico, said tliat be was not satisfied- < ;■f tbat de'fenflant'.had;donc/for plaintiff.!'what' '-' could- be calledi.if day's work. Ho would give ' judgment Ipr plaintiff foi.the amount-claimed <G?), Vith costs 'of court amounting to Gs." t 'Ihoirss,George.v. Williiu'n Gingal! George. --Caini i> 145,/ucloitcV due on 12 weeks' bo.ir.l and lodging for Miss George at .the rate oi . < G-.1 pa- week, supplied at defendant's request.-After hearing evidence on both *idcs, judgment ws« given for plaintiff for £> vs, v.-ith costs amounting to £1 12s.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19060911.2.67
Bibliographic details
Otago Daily Times, Issue 13695, 11 September 1906, Page 7
Word Count
344MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Otago Daily Times, Issue 13695, 11 September 1906, Page 7
Using This Item
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Otago Daily Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.