Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

-T ' '♦ . ■ . MoiSIUV, SePTESiUER" 10. . (Before Mr 11.-Y. Wlddowson, S.U.j ■/ Judgment was given for plaintiffs, bv. default, in tho following caws;— Lottie We'dlake v. John Munro, c;aim J>2 lis Gd, fov goodi supplied (costs lie); Charles Begg and Co. v. Horaco Stewart (liolorua), claim £1 Ss 7d, lor goods sold and delivered (costs ss); Johnston. Sons, and Co. v. Arthur William Eftwards (Christcburch!. claim £6 Ga-fcosts £1 3s . W)j. S.,J Best and Co. v. Edwin Ilamw (Otautaii),'claim £0. 3s Bd, for goods supplied (costs £1 3s-Gel). Edg'nr Ju-ju* Thomson v. DichsrclXhnmly £4 13s, on a judgment sum- .. minis.—There \vm no appearance of (Wend- ! ■nt.' and no reason'tor tion-anpccrnr.ee.—An ' ordoi'Mvns made .that unless Om' amount- ' claimed,. >vhieh included costs amounting to is, 1» paid fortwlth. 'do.fcndanl bo imprisoned in Uuredin Gaol for seven days. '• 1). :stilliga-n v. Frank F. Hartnctt (Dunedin).—Claim £2 14s, on a judgment summons. --There was no appearance defendant and To reason for, iion-appearanoe.—The Magistrate luada an'order'that unless tljo amount claimed (£3 Hs); together with 5s costs, be paidforthwith, defontliut be imprisoned in, Duncdin Gao' for seven '3«vsA Robert Marshall" (Pino Hill) v, ''Frederick '. Morgan -(St. Leonards).—Claim: Gs, being I amount dijo to plaintiff on r.-: I 0 U giveit to ; : him by defendant on tho Sill of August Inst: .— Defendant put in a counter claim fo r 8?. being one day's wage due to him as an employee of ■ the plaintiff.—Mr Wilkinson appeared for plaintiff, riu! Mr Irwin for defendant.—The IOl) was admired, but defendant contended that i» day's wages (8s) \%s due to him by plaintiff.—His Worship, after. hht- !.. ing cviderico, said tliat be was not satisfied- < ;■f tbat de'fenflant'.had;donc/for plaintiff.!'what' '-' could- be calledi.if day's work. Ho would give ' judgment Ipr plaintiff foi.the amount-claimed <G?), Vith costs 'of court amounting to Gs." t 'Ihoirss,George.v. Williiu'n Gingal! George. --Caini i> 145,/ucloitcV due on 12 weeks' bo.ir.l and lodging for Miss George at .the rate oi . < G-.1 pa- week, supplied at defendant's request.-After hearing evidence on both *idcs, judgment ws« given for plaintiff for £> vs, v.-ith costs amounting to £1 12s.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19060911.2.67

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 13695, 11 September 1906, Page 7

Word Count
344

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Otago Daily Times, Issue 13695, 11 September 1906, Page 7

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Otago Daily Times, Issue 13695, 11 September 1906, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert