Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE DART RIVER GOLD DREDGING COMPANY.

TO THE EDITOR. _ Sir,-By tho report of the Magistrate's Court ill the Times to-day I sea that three mifovInnate shareholders in tho above company were sued lot is per share, and judgment \yas given against them by default. Why did tliev not appear and dispute the claim? It could not bo lagally enforced, as by the terms of tile prospectus 110 more than 7s per slime was' to be called tip without a unanimous vote of tho shareholders. There lm3 been more bungliii" in the management of this claim than in any oilier I have invested in. I hope the shareholders will combine to defend any court cases to enforce payment of this cstr#. Is per shave. I certain'- - :n ——• - •• expenses.

... ..... W j 4uuni luvwras itic -I am, etc., Shareholder No. 1.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19020726.2.97

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 12415, 26 July 1902, Page 10

Word Count
138

THE DART RIVER GOLD DREDGING COMPANY. Otago Daily Times, Issue 12415, 26 July 1902, Page 10

THE DART RIVER GOLD DREDGING COMPANY. Otago Daily Times, Issue 12415, 26 July 1902, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert