MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
Monday, Aran, 1. (Before Mr E. H. Carew, S.M.) ' Durham and Co. (Portobello) v. Thomas S. Hewitt (Poitobc!!o).-Claim M 12s &1.-Tliero being no evidence of ability to pay the claim since judgment was obtained, the case was dismissed. T. E. Shiel and Co. v. Robert Henry'Kidd (Duntrcon).—Claim £1 14s Cd, lor fririt'sup.plied.—Judgment for plaintiffs, with costs (Hs). F. Montague and Co. v. Thomas J. Lunudra (Invcrcargill).—Claim £14 5b Cd, on a Bishonoured promissory note with' interest added.— Judgment for plaintiffs' for amount claimed, with costs (803 6d). ' ■ ■ W. J. Paterson v. Jcmes Aiidorsou.—Claim £i 2s Cd, (or jewellery supplied—Judgment for plaintiff, with coste (11s).
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19010402.2.69
Bibliographic details
Otago Daily Times, Issue 12007, 2 April 1901, Page 7
Word Count
106MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Otago Daily Times, Issue 12007, 2 April 1901, Page 7
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.