THE OCEAN BEACH AND ST. CLAIR.
TO THE EDITOR. SlB Your ' leading article nf Saturday, advocates a scheme suggested by Colonel Morris ' for conserving the Ocean -Beach .>•■;; 'As author 'Of a Bcheme-prßsentlv; before, the Domain Board, it. would be bad taste-in the highest'degree for me to oritic.se the work of a competitor; but Colouel-.Momsis iiot a competitor-he merely threw out a suggestion, and as you have taken up this suggestion. -in, your. leading column I conceive I have, therefore, the privilege, of comparing it with my own plan, '■ . ' ' , Colonel Morris did nothing more than throw out a suggestion that as at ■Madras, where a beach was being 'eaten away-by the,sea,: n system of groynes had been .found to"be. an effectual remedy, if the conditions -vat, the-. Oceftn'Bfeach'-were simildr, the..same.<.remedy. miaht apply.■;•■•'•■■ '■' ' '■' '■'■ •"■■■ '-■'■ •■'* '•"■' '"■mi" •.-Thisvis'the-.arux. of the-whole matter: j me conditions are not -similari and.'. the remedies; must-therefore^ be' different.. -At Madras th£ beach Jwas'baingrieaten away and .the,sea ad-, vancing inland at the rate of a: mile.in 2Qyears —an average of 88 yardsia year,. Ouribeach is not being wasted similarly .at, a3l; its. .•lowwater mark is practically ;now. where it was 30 years ago. For , all praqtical / purposes, what maybe called'the beach (proper, as-dis-, tinguished from the Sandhills, for weather disturbances, what it has ever.been. The; source'of trouble is entirely the removal of the Sandhills.'-•:• ' ■■■ .■ ■ '■■• -■ ■ There-is at present a large lagoon opposite the St. Kilda tram line. This is no new thing; I can remember -it .years ago, as large, v or even larger, than it is now,—but, then there was.a range..of sandhills, narrow, indeed, but intact, between.it and the Flat, and there was never a thought of irruption. ■ These hills have been carted away, and there-is nothing now,to prevent the high seas or-a high tide., overflowing on the Flat. . , ..,,•: .. The trouble at St. Clair is that sandhills which should have been left ..untouched, as a barrier against the ocean, halve been sold, as building allotments—more, ..the Esplanade cribbed. some half a chain yfrom the beach, The sea has now only resumed its own. JTho freehold property east of the dietricfi rbaid , should, itiso have been retained as part.of the, defences against the.ocean,- which bad weather would attack and fine build up. Assuming these remarks to be-true, and; I am at a loss to see how they can be denied, it will be seen the problem is totally different from that at Madras. ' What is wanted is not : to.prevent a beach^being;eaten,away:;,,,but < -to raise sandhills. .The beach, as d.jst^iag^J^|e3. from tbW Sandhills is already there to. receive the'shbclr'cif the surf.: 'It.-will fJattWn r;or';bej- M come steeper j1 acdordihg' tb'-the: Wekther y tiu't ■ the background protection of skndhills 'must' be raised again. Ip np simpler or' cheaper manner can .'this'be dope than, by the means I propose of parallel fences, some 30ft apart, interlaced • with scrub. The.iences must'noti be top high,bu.t the sand raised.gradually^ and the operation well supervised. . . V '■ > . When the ■ sandhills are- raised^'.'vand thfl\ whole domain planted with trees as proposed, the city would gain an ornament, and • the , citizens a beautiful recreation ground. It'has been said that the supply of sand haß ceased— the rivers- being full o." gold-mining1 'silt. From Tewaewae Bay to the Ocean -Beach every beach is sand, and none are growing smaller; ' .'" ' ' '"■','•' :. '. It iB also asserted that a. solid wall will .never stand at St. Clair. I think experience I proves, the- contrary. The first wall, badly ; buiit',' and with ' a very' slight foundation, | stood for matty years.. .It is a fair assump'-'' tion that a solid waJl. with.a toe.founded well down and a good way back from the original wall, wij]. stand easily enough. . The beacK is,, I the great attraction of St. .Glair,, and.'some,; | attention to. appearances shouja be considered jin .the design of the wall; further it *vould,be , |. a pity 'to ruin '^he sandy beachf by a. rubfele, apron or toe. ' , ■ .; . ■; As | summary f would'say where: sandhills now exist there is no danger to the Flat from the ocean. What they Jose in a .bad; season they will gain in a fine one, but protect them , by planting. ; Where sandhills,have, disappeared raise them by fences arid scrub.. Pro- ' tect Sfc Clajrby a solid 'wall.^l>am, sic,,-., i •" ',-■:■ •'.■■' •v- ,-., - , .-.- ' ■•. ''W ; -Hi-HtITCBEBO!i» >■■ ~ ■
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT18980810.2.63
Bibliographic details
Otago Daily Times, Issue 11188, 10 August 1898, Page 7
Word Count
705THE OCEAN BEACH AND ST. CLAIR. Otago Daily Times, Issue 11188, 10 August 1898, Page 7
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.