CITY POLICE COURT.
■ -. ':' ■-.:■,. .. ~ ;.'«■.. — ..:■.. ;•■"■ ■'■-• TCBSDAY, AUGTJST 9. ' (Befoße Messrs G/L. Denhiston and W. I ~.;., ... ■- Dickspn, J.P.'s.) ■ ..', ': . Drunkemiess.^-HeuryfSimpkins, an 'inmate of the Benevolent Institution, last before the court | in May, • was ■ convicted* and' discharged. :"Wilv | lia'n Wilson.who appeared with his head bound I up, was also.convicted.and discharged, the sergeant of police explaining that, the man bad .received a. fall while'he-was'^intoxicated.-^Anhie. : Filer-, last before &c court in December, 1897, -appeared to answer &:!cliarge of being drunk, j ' Sergeant'" O'Neillf- said•>-the woman went to Christchurch, when'last ; charged, to go into the j . Magdalen' Home, But' only -remained in: that in- I | stitutipn 15 minutes..." fPhe, bench decided to.. | give the. woman.. a- chance, and convicted and - discharged her.—Pe't|r.,:S.besi, ..who.. had.; been once, previously'convicted within the. past six I' ; months, was.firie'd ss, with,,the.Alternative 0f,'24 !j ■.hciifa';i'^n^onrtrertt:i'^."'"■"'■■■■".•' ■-'•'■■-'• 7-'■■•'-;•'■• "_ [• t By-'.aWCS^s.^'&or'naving'nnregistefed dogs' ' Tin their; Martin, EdWard Ba^n-^ ! ford, and Charles John Hayes were;each fuieif1' |'ss, without costsfJrrA'casp against; JpbiiJ, Sheft i ■^was'.^withdrEiwnv ,there';aeyjae"ntry-'being some [mistake maSe.—Robert,.jjj£ckie was .fined 10s, (without costs, for allOTdng cattle1 to wancler, xjn {••the j%n^eji;:.;,, *:, *£:;■:<'■ "'■'-■'■ ■>:"-••••• j> P'rgh,i.bition, Orde^Tp-.Op;; his ; .own application,. ■ j-!a iirohibitipn^ order; against Wil- ! Kliaiii V/ijsbnj^preyi'dUsly-fcharged 'witli,drunl{en-. ; •new.. ■"• '' lA-% t '"-''■" • '■:' ''. ■ '■■.;■/>: \ ' r '•\'. ■:' '.',:-; i False ■Pret'enc'es:.r^Qe6ir|fe!'X£'Kay wjis Charged' .Nvitte-liavffig,'- at'-IDunedin; pn''July'36,'with' in-::: 'teritHo -defßitjd;!^oWtaiiied'.irom^Willlftm'Heriry :" Fox. tV'tin .ot'itobaccp,' a,"'packefciof;tobacco;.'a : j-;packet;,pt cigarettes, 'ai>cl:;three ; cigarette.books,, '.of the vßrhie^of 4s, by means.bf a false pretence..-• ! '—Mr..Hanlon appeared: for accusedj'who pleaded j guilty.—-Sergeant O'lfeili ;sta,ted.,t}jat ! %vorit'..'intb the shop of Mi-. F'os, in King street, j and :.represeiited i^at.',hs..Md_Jteen_serit .by^llr,-1 I Laing to obtain these gb'ods for him.—Sir Hanj lon,-'in estemiation ofthe offence, said that the 1' accused was a married' man, and had very ! stupidly gofhirnse'if into trouble. He had comj'mitted two othei offencesrionthesam'^, date, and' 'it appeared as if he had on that particular date 'ran inclination to. do'what was improper. He l^was brought. befbre t the court on the othai' two .charges, and sentenced tci j.wo weeks!, imprisonment, the sentences tq'b'i'.cdncurrent. Counsel ' submitted.that if ;accu's'ed''had 'been charged at " the- same'time under the Hjifd)information, the '■ sentences •would1 have^been' three weeks' imprisonment, the sentences fbr.un, concurrently. • It wn3 no use f.ehding him back to gaol on the ■■■ present charge. He.had profited by his:'expert. ■ enc«,-from-what he had tojd counsel J,^a{ morp-1 - ins, and counsel aubmitted fhat .he pKouldnow, be" convicted, and ordered, to come up for sen- : tc-nce when.'called on.-SsC|lp;.tenfih could'not sea ' their way to do this, but in'.'plaoe of sending accused to gaol, fined, him ;ios,':wi{h the.alternativp of 48 hours' imprisonment. "' Charges Against Drivers'- of.....Vehicles.— R. -Mason pleaded gtiiltyto plying for",hire else-whera-than at tKe appbihted stand, and' was I fined 2s 6tl, '.without costs,—Bobert Phimister ' was .charged .with'driving a;,vehiole./across the iiintersection of Moray plac,e ; and G-ebrge street at,, {•'ether than a walking. pace,—Mr Hanlon, who ? Appeared for accused.,' askea;..for, an adjournf,. Vm«nt\''aß:'I'»h''I'imptittant-'«^'fiaß''waß;.not''in.1'imptittant-'«^'fiaß''waß;.not''in. at-- ■■ tendance: 'The case wis under the'eity bylaws;- :- ',■ and:'there'"wouia'be the'"question of the council; "arantihg'stfchdß not'act.bivtrin the, by-laws;—Mr, !!Dentii3ton: asked ft'Mr HJnlon' wanted to loolc i up the case, to whiolt Mr Hanlon replied in the 1 necative. adding that his Worship was a membar of the eorporatioh.-^-Mr. Denniston: You I don't, suggest that that: makes any difference.- ---! Mr Hanlon •' Legiilly stfejtkifig,1 it .does, your ■'Worship. The cas-e,is. thought under the city by-laws and in such' a matter no member of the corpbralion/I think,, should'sit in judgment. Therefore pertain stands'.appointed by the City -Corßoration, and"l think the.ca^e sh,'ovkl come ■before another bench.-The case was adjourned ; 'to Thursday next, _•;.;■.<,;.;; , .j ■'. ■ .
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT18980810.2.60
Bibliographic details
Otago Daily Times, Issue 11188, 10 August 1898, Page 7
Word Count
562CITY POLICE COURT. Otago Daily Times, Issue 11188, 10 August 1898, Page 7
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.