THE STATEMENT CRITICISED.
1 VIEWS OF 'SOME MEMBERS. ' (From Our' Own Correspondent.) _ • Pf ifhkepld light p^ day ji^'Hot cor(dus|\'| tb| fyan £<|oqiient dis|ej'tatidnjon> figure's^ sjmd|Mr|; "■■'Seddon" was not seen at his" best in reading "■ his Financial Statement this afternoon. In- j deed, it had quite a; soptfrific effect on memr bers on both sides'of ■ the House;, but more ■particularly on his own .followers, C for two members of the Ministry and-severa) promi- : nent .followers fell fast asleep.! The general, impression amongst competent critics is. oneof utter amazement at the audacity of the , Premier and the Treasury officials in setting ] forth such fallaoioWUables' anUVdeductions as : occur in the Statement. I have obtained the opinions of several members on the Statement. . ' .-.-.■ ' ; ■-, Mr George -Hutchison says: Mr Seddon remarked s that a Sixth Form schoolboy could collate'the 'figures he has done in comparing . the deficits and surpluses of the last 27 yeari. :as he does in his last deliverance-in the shape of a Financial Statement. This is his own ' of- his powere as to ;• the statistics . brought together by himself. But' any sixth, ■■ or other, form schoolboy who. would attempt the', inferences he,has. been'guilty of in con nebtiori , with these figures/would deserve a thrashing, and would certainly be put to the bottom,'of, his class. 'If the, Colonial Treasurer Sid-not Know the officials of the Treasury shpuld have told him, that within the term of : i the present Administration the/whole! system i-of dealing; with 'the sinkingl, fund-increases has been so 'altered' as -to destroy' any comparison such as ; lie "-seijks to, draw. Besides, . he should not have forgotten that within tho last:three' yeairsMVe lias, taken about £150,000 of tKe sinking funds of the local bodies—a ~ political fcrime, tjijit, iio" predecessor was meat) ''.^noiiglw'to^'imagirie'.-J If/Mr rSeddon, had not. raised the Nemesis of .'the past-his Financial ~ Statement 'would have' excited; ;ljttle contrri_,:.The figures-'as- to-ithe consolidate! fund were known months ago.' .His Estimattw for the current year* are riot'remarkable. The f inter.es.t in "ii\e<, Statement is e'entjfed; in tho ■ •proposals as*f6: ;tlie;pubtfe worts'fund.' The Treasurer indicates that expenditure this year >' forf public.,ijrqrk^ Would;.approximate the pxi:,periditur©.''bfllast'TtJrear,*'which he stated at ; about. £800,000.;', ..Seeing that-at, the begin- [ -.ning.pf^ the, financial year .the public works ■ ,j,acc6tu}t was ov§r,- £300,000, in debit, with re- j sources of; only about- £25,000 unexhausted, : supposing the appropriation for the current; -, :. year. to' am'diint'tfd' £750,000- "we.' fin'd..'t.he. o'Bir ;, ■ gations of the fund, on the , year'? • transactions might '.in roiincl numbers be stated at : ■£100,000,. Agarnkt-thi5..£425,00.0.J5..t0be. trans- '. ferred from the consolidated fund and :-£500',000 to be' borrowed. These figures ■,'ftearly equalise, biit^ indicate that the policy is merely temporary, and 'that next, year we' will again be face to face with more expedients for " tiding'Qver.:? There is an entire lack of anything like,a policy. The signiS- ; cant part of the' finance of the year is the in- * creasing, drain upon revenue—in other words. | taxation—for what are called " reproductive: ; wor;ks.;r Hitherto f£3OP,;OOO hq4. b*n the ut-' most transferred in any financial year, "and isow. the former limit is this year to be exceeded by . £125,000, or a "total-of-£l-25,000. That close on half a million should be taken from taxation for works that .are usually coni sidejred a proper charge on capital, and, if reproductive, ought'to!be,'self-supporting, is a fact full of significance. What a policy might be given effect -fo, grand and comprehensive, but,utterly; beyond the initiative• of ' tHe present Administration ! Even to suggeso ' it would be waste of time. If the Govern- , me,nj;' attempted to deal with it they would I only make a mess.of it,- Tho difference be- ; [ tween proper management and. bungling ; inaringement indicates the difference betweavi : I the present and whatij^night bq.Treaß.onably ! expected to follow-.a change. i rf.■'•'''. ' | j;: i^iMfV^6l^esta^'Cyiiews.on''t.he St^n|fnt and ' jfoii thd Premier'1 sisiibse&uent'assertipnff regardI ing the coming firi'ancial'deb'ateare'as follows: ! |-~, I.thjnk, the Statement is.about as.bakl and uninstructiWa's"it''cto',be.' ! sion to make reflections on -what Mr Seddon [ i is pleased to call t Conservafire "G'6yer»ments ',' . is. out of place in'su'ch'a Sratementr, which 1 : ought to keep clear-of-party politics,, and to ' be devoted to the finance of the past and pre- : sent (year. .- Mr: Seddon'*' subsequeijt' threkt' :■' ■ that the debating .of his . Statement would I I keep men out of work^was a piece- of unwar- j I rantable bounce. '' Ministers were responsible ! for the knocking off of ..the.wpi'kmeny.and it ; lies with- them to take the earliest authority ' to put, them on again. .He r)id not hesitate '. to put in hand a lot bf" unnecessary work"' in I I connection .with Parliament.Buildings in • : VVellington without; 'authority.',when,it suited ! his purposes. It. in' utter nonsense to. say | that' ways' and means *must Ke foHihd" before '■ the Premier discloses the details of expendi- | ture. The House ought to know what are therequirements—such as rolling .stock, etc.— 1 and then find ■ways!iahd'means-.<)U't;of'-re-('eh'-iie j or'loan; as'may seem fit. At Home, unless I i am very much mistalieny the-:Estimates are ] passed before the ■Statement is made. Mr Seddon'B attempts to mystify.the public raid mislead them into thinking that the question of employment of. a-number of working-men is dependent upon the ctea'li'ng with the ordinary Estimates is, ql|pgether .top flimsy, and: 1 i-eflects little'credit'b'n his political judgment 8 or sincerity: The House bought' to have the , Public Works Statement and Estimates, and to consider them .before determining any qu.es. iion'oi ways arid, liieihsr : :' '', ' ;> ' ■ ''' 1
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT18980810.2.36
Bibliographic details
Otago Daily Times, Issue 11188, 10 August 1898, Page 6
Word Count
880THE STATEMENT CRITICISED. Otago Daily Times, Issue 11188, 10 August 1898, Page 6
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.