RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
■ « Monday, Febitoaey 26. • (Before Mr B. H. Carew, R.M.) Judgment was given for the plaintiffsi with costs, in the following undefended cases: — Butterworth Bros. (Limited) v. W. Fenton (Napier), claim -£32 &s 10d, -on a dishonoured promissory note; D. Benjamin and Co. v. James Tocker (Feafcherston), claim £18 03 Bd, on a dishonoured promissory note; Kearns and Sons (for whom Dr Fitchett appeared, on behalf of Mr Solomon) v. Thomas 6. Kenny (Timaru), claim £9 18s, for goods supplied and interest (judgment to £9 16s); S. SlesiDger (for whom Dr Fitchett appeared) v. Adam Baillie (Winchester), claim £6 12s, for goods supplied; William Hutchinson v. John Burns (Mikiwaka), claim £1 3s 6d, for goods supplied; Thomas Paterson (for whom Mr A. S. Adams appeared) v. Matthew Mortimer (Hampden), claim £12 8s 3d, on a dishonoured promissory note. ____________
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT18940227.2.56
Bibliographic details
Otago Daily Times, Issue 9983, 27 February 1894, Page 4
Word Count
140RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Otago Daily Times, Issue 9983, 27 February 1894, Page 4
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in