Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Thuesdav, November 23. (Before Messas W. L. Simpson and H F

Vriw" n\ S- U Vn Edward M««-doch,North-East IKtyll<3lOD a J^gment sum-mons-Mr Wilkinson for plaintiff.-Defendent did not appear, and was ordered to pay the amount still due, with costs, by two instalment 8 'iD defauU four d*ya' im v**™Same v. James Ledgerwood.—Claim £3, for work done.—Judgment by default, with costs Simon Brothers v. Leonard Rooney (Rox WtT^T £, 2HS' for e°°a8rappliedvi Fitchett for plaintiffs, for whom iudement was given by default, with costs (6s) Samev. Donald-H-Kay (Hyde)-Claim £2 b^d, for goods supplied.—Judgment by default with costs (£1 ss), Globe Newspaper and Publishing Company (Limited) v. Peter Campbell (Shag Point).--Uaim £14s, for calls due on shares,—-Mr J A p. Adams for plantiff company, for whom judgment was given by default, with co3ts r, 7 S^ e/- William Bloy (Lawrence) .-Claim ■?'_ J-0- 1. »or calls due on shares.—Judgment by default, with costs (£2 12s). Same v. Andrew Mowat Gow (Oamaru).— Uamii £5, f or caUs due ou SQareS- _ Mr j' A O. Adams for plaintifi company, and Mr A. C. Hanlon for defendant.-Mr Adams stated that Ue was not prepared to go on with the case, and asfeed for an adjournment.—Mr Hanlon objected i«,!S JoUmmen\ " tho'pWnttflE company. tnltt T mT BJ they Bhould come PWed to proceed wtth the case. He submitted, seeing that defendant had come all the way from Oamaru that the b ß nch could have no literal tive but to nonsuit the plaintiff company, with costs. -EWuiffs nonsuited, with costs (£1 Is) "fl !%?s f ucker/- Edward A. Pearce.-Claim' f b sa, °d '.fof work done.-Mr J. A. D Adams ment by default, with costs (£1 Is) S Mary Robertson v. Charles Armour.-Claim wfthStsT^ lenfc-Judgment bydef^,;

Hardy, J.P's.)

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT18931124.2.54

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 9904, 24 November 1893, Page 5 (Supplement)

Word Count
289

Untitled Otago Daily Times, Issue 9904, 24 November 1893, Page 5 (Supplement)

Untitled Otago Daily Times, Issue 9904, 24 November 1893, Page 5 (Supplement)

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert