Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE MERVYN CASE.

TO THE EDITOR. Sir, —Allow me to give the most unqualified contradiction to the statement, to which my attention has just been called, of Mr D. H. Mervyn in your paper of the 27th ult., that Mr John Smith, of Smith and Sons, Greenfisld Station, purchased a section at Tuapeka West at an extreme price, the license of which was cancelled on application by the Waste Lands Board. Mr John Smith, of Smith and Sons, never purchased a section at Tuapeka West, and never had a license for any section there or elsewhere cancelled. It is a pity that Mr Mervyn was not more correct in "quoting instances," as inaccuracies like the foregoing very materially weaken the cause which ne would advocate. I write this on behalf of my son, who has not vet seen Mr Mervyn's letter. —I am, &c, James Smith.

Lawrence, October 2nd,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT18821003.2.31

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 6440, 3 October 1882, Page 4

Word Count
149

THE MERVYN CASE. Otago Daily Times, Issue 6440, 3 October 1882, Page 4

THE MERVYN CASE. Otago Daily Times, Issue 6440, 3 October 1882, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert