Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PORT CHALMERS. (Before T. A. Mansford, Esq., R.M)

Roderick M'Keczie v. JohnM"Kenzi&— Claim to recover £34, value of 910 tramway sleepers and 50 cords firewotftl; sleepers, 40s per 100; firewood, 6s per cord.—Defendant pleaded not indebted.—Mr Chapman appeared for the plaintiff, and stated that his client had contracted to cut so many s'eepfcrs and so much firewood for the defendant, the sleepars to be from sft. 6in. to sft. 10in. iong. He performed his part of the contract, and the defendant accepted the delivery of sleepers and firewood.-—The plaintiff, R. M'Kenzie, give evidence to show that he had cut the firewood and sleepers, and produced two wituesses to substantiate his statement. A man named Upton, » brickmakcr, was involvt d in the : contract for tho firewood, but the defendant, M'Kenzie,.was the person who had agreed to be responsible for the payment of it.—The defendant, J. M'Kenzie, averred that the contract had not boon completed, only 192. sleepers having been delivered, and they not being the required length, were useless to hi'n. The firewood was cut, not for him, but for Upton ; but the defendant had promised to see that it was paid for. Two witnesses supported the defendant's testimony. —Tho Court said the ciie was very unsatisfactory so far, aud would be adjourned for one week, in order that tho evidence of an entirely disinterested person iiiight bs obtained, upon the qualitj', size, and number of sleepers delivered. With regard to the firewood, it was evident the defendant had nothing to do with it; the man Upton would have to be sued.

Phoebe Medley v, John Heuot.—Case adjourned from last week. No appearance of plaint,ff— Judgment for defendant, with full costs.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT18760510.2.23

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 4438, 10 May 1876, Page 3

Word Count
280

PORT CHALMERS. (Before T. A. Mansford, Esq., R.M) Otago Daily Times, Issue 4438, 10 May 1876, Page 3

PORT CHALMERS. (Before T. A. Mansford, Esq., R.M) Otago Daily Times, Issue 4438, 10 May 1876, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert