Appeal Court.
the brunner case. (BY TRIE GRAPH.) Wellington, May 16. slr Jellicoe's argument for the plaintiffs j,j the case of Geoghegan in the Grey-mouth-Point Elizabeth Railway and Coal Company was not concluded when the Court of Appeal rose this afternoon. The father points discussed this afterncon were as to whether the discretion to Intervene on behalf of the debentureioldera had been delegated by the trustees or their attorneys in New Zealand, ind further, whether the steps taken by the attorneys were sufficient to dispossess the Company and render the security of tha debenture-holders a specific security, specific property of the Commny. The instructions of the attorneys to their agent to seize were that he should not take possession of leaseholds so as to lender the debenture-holders liable to tent and the performance of covenants. Re contended that this restriction pretested possession by the debentureMders of the mine and plant from being sufficiently complete to oust the plaintiff.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OAM18980517.2.16
Bibliographic details
Oamaru Mail, Volume XXIII, Issue 7212, 17 May 1898, Page 3
Word Count
158Appeal Court. Oamaru Mail, Volume XXIII, Issue 7212, 17 May 1898, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in