Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Supreme Court.

(BY tblegbaph.) Dunedin, December 9. The Supreme Court was occupied today with the charge of perjury preferred against a young man named Edward Sheath. The case arises out of a sly grog prosecution recently at Tapanui. According to the constable, Sheath gave him certain information, and signed a statement. In the court Sheath denied having signed the statement. To-day witnesses for the defence gave evidence that Sheath was with them on the night, at about the time he was supposed to be with the police constable. Officers from five banks, while not prepared to swear that the signature to the statement was not written by the same person as admitted the signature of Sheath (produced), all declared they would not pay out on the signature, to the statement. The case is not concluded.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OAM18961210.2.3

Bibliographic details

Oamaru Mail, Volume XXI, Issue 6763, 10 December 1896, Page 1

Word Count
135

Supreme Court. Oamaru Mail, Volume XXI, Issue 6763, 10 December 1896, Page 1

Supreme Court. Oamaru Mail, Volume XXI, Issue 6763, 10 December 1896, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert