Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

THIS DAY. [Before T. W. Parker, Esq., J.P.] DRUJTi. AND DISORDERLY. Edward Murphy and Oscar Brown, both pleaded " Guilty" to the above charge, and were discharged with a caution. NEGLECTED CHILDREN. Jane Elizabeth Bentley, aged eight years; George, aged six; and Ellen Moore Bentley, aged one year and eight months, were brought up and charged as neglected children. Sub-Inspector M'Cluskey stated that their father had deserted them, and Mrs. Bentley had been disposing of her articles of furniture, one by one, to provide food. Now, however, all was gone, and they were houseless and homeless. His Worship made an order for their admission into the Benevolent Institution. BREACH OF THE CORPORATION BYE-LAWS. Jarvis White was informed against by the Inspector of Nuisances for not keeping his yard clean. It appeared the nuisance complained against was the keeping of pigs, and as defendant has got rid cf the lot with the exception of two, and promised to part with them also, the Bench, adjourned the case until Monday, to allow cf an opportunity of doing so. TRESPASS. Patrick Minchin was charged, on the complaint of Thomas Jones, with trespassing upon Section 15, Block LXXII., now in occupation of the plaintiff. Mr. O'Meagher appeared for Jones, and said that plaintiff was in occupation of Sections 14, 15, 16, and 17, Block

LXXII. He rented Section 14 from Mr. Procter," and Section 15 from Mr. T. Everett. On the first inst. defendant crossed over Section 15, broke part of the fence, and threw it down the bank. Defendant said he would cross the section whenever he liked, and refused to leave. The plaintiff gave evidence of the trespass, and, after hearing the statement of defendant, who was also in the box, his Worship said defendant had no right whatever over the land of plaintiff; but, as the costs were somewhat high, he would make the penalty a nominal one. The defendant was liable, for his conduct, to have a penalty of £lO, or one month's imprisonment, inflicted. As it was, he would fine him Is., and £2 Is. costs. ABUSIVE LANGUAGE. The same complainant then brought a charge against last defendant's wife, of using abusive language, and asking that she be bound over to keep the peace. There was a cross-case brought of assault, and through the obtuseness of witnesses, plaintiffs and defendants, it was almost impossible to know which case was before the Bench. One witness was in the box, and was being subjected to a perfect volley of jnvectire, when our reporter thought it wise to retire. [Left squabbling.]

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OAM18770125.2.8

Bibliographic details

Oamaru Mail, Volume I, Issue 237, 25 January 1877, Page 2

Word Count
430

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Oamaru Mail, Volume I, Issue 237, 25 January 1877, Page 2

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Oamaru Mail, Volume I, Issue 237, 25 January 1877, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert