Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

EPIGRAMMATIC

Legal Red Herrings

Across Trail

(From "N.Z, Truth's" Dunedin Rep,) If the marital affairs gf John MacKay and Annio May Allison BaUantyne, of South Dunedin, were not altogether a criterion of connubial glossiness, they were responsible for some wisdom from the lips of counoel involved, IJEARKEN to the aphorism of O Lawyer Alt Hanlon, the wife's legal gladiator m the couple's court arguments over a separation order; <'Np -.worse form of cruelty than irrepressible jealousy could be inflicted on a. good and chaste woman." And Lawyer Sinclair, at the hu§7 band's side^-"Obviously it is a wife's duty to comply with her husband's wishes; if he wishes. her to discontinue certain friendships, she should do. so.". John and Annie had a bit of a judiolal flutter about four months ago,

■i Annie's contention at that time was that her had failed to maintain herself and two children, and the net result of their wrangle before Magistrate" Bundle

was a sine die adjournment.

Back to the' maintenance court came John and Annie last Friday to hear what the magistrate had. to say after perusing Probation OiflcerQar--butt's opinion -of the. difficulties!, .;'' .

His worship's pronouncement that on the strength of the report and the evidence on the previous, hearing he was not; disposed to make a separation or'deiv though be might consider the matr tei 4 of ah order for maintenance, ". did not suit complainant's, counsel, who then and thex-e asked for the.application grounds to be amended to cruelty.

When asked by defending 1 counsel how cruelty could be brought into the complaint at this stage of the case, the wife's counsel flourished a newly-made skeleton key; which he claimed had been recently constructed by the defendant for the. purpose of harassing Mrs. BaUantyne m her bedroom.

„ Followed the aforemerittoriecl philosophic discourse and a further adjournment "until- November 16.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTR19281115.2.40

Bibliographic details

NZ Truth, Issue 1198, 15 November 1928, Page 8

Word Count
306

EPIGRAMMATIC NZ Truth, Issue 1198, 15 November 1928, Page 8

EPIGRAMMATIC NZ Truth, Issue 1198, 15 November 1928, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert