Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

VERY WEAK SPOT

Ridiculous Anomaly In New Act

(From "Truth's" Special Chris,t;church » , Rep.) . ' ■•;■■- It „is a truism that no A.st of Parliament was ever 'placed on the statute-book which",' m its initial form, fulfilled tp the full the intention of the l-egislature. THIS applies to the new legislation prqvidinig for Children's Courts, and already serious gaps m the Act are showing 1 up. '. c Striking evidence of this was afforded m the case of a 17-year-old boy, Selwyn Baker of Christchurchr when he appeared for gen tence 'before 'the Judge on five charges of assaults, oni gir-ls. ; ' . i The boy— as regards age-r- was well within the scope of the protective provisions of f:he. Children's Court, but m 'view of the fact that his offences were outside the penal jurisdiction, off a Magistrate' (and therefore of the Chilr dren's Court), the lad suffers th,e fill} penalty of publicity. Thus has.' arisen a position '■ which the Act was expressly in^ tencjed to ayoid. When Baker appeared - before the judge, his counsel (Mr. C. S. Thomas) asked that the case be i-efejred back to the Children's "Court, the Minister of Justice having advised that it could deal' with it. ; ;' But here was the difficulty. Baker b&<i pleaded guilty m the lower court to the charges and merely figured m the higher court as a person for sentence and not for trial and conviction. / Problem For Judge • The problem confronting Judge Adams was this: Baker was not an accused person when he appeared for sentence. He was a convicted prisoner. Here, obviously, is a flaw m the Act that will probably be amendecj, In such cases as indictable offences, which are outside the scope of a Magistrate, the offenders must, m the natural prder of things* come befqre the Supreme Court, where they are not protected from publicity .as they are m the lower court. '■';'' This has.-been proved m Baiter's case, and the whole object of th.9 Act has been defeated. The , l-emedy would appear to b'e-r-' if the Act -is to be effective-rrfor the same protection as is given m the Children's Co.m*t tP be automatically carried forward to the higher court. That is to say, • m the event of a youth, of Children's Court age, having to be dealt with by a judge, he should be entitled to the same consideration with regard to publicity as tie would get m the Court belqw. • - Otherwise the new Act will bi ■. npthing more than a farcti

>J her evidence,' the* girl •naid she had ■ worked, for Mi?. an<J Mps. Sbuthee, .of Awatuna, for nine years, having been left m their care by her father. Tw p ■ years ago phe first met Braaghaw, whp , was farming Jn the di^trici;.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTR19260805.2.31.2

Bibliographic details

NZ Truth, Issue 1079, 5 August 1926, Page 9

Word Count
455

VERY WEAK SPOT NZ Truth, Issue 1079, 5 August 1926, Page 9

VERY WEAK SPOT NZ Truth, Issue 1079, 5 August 1926, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert